This essay considers the requirement of state action in suits brought against private corporations under the Alien Tort Statute. It argues that, in addressing this requirement, courts have erred in applying the state action jurisprudence developed under the domestic civil rights statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It also argues that, even if it were appropriate to borrow in this manner from the Section 1983 cases, such borrowing would not support the allowance of aiding and abetting liability against corporations, and that this liability is also problematic on a number of other grounds
Courts continue to struggle with theories of liability for corporations under the Alien Tort Statute...
JESNER v Arab Bank plc 584 U.S. __ (2018) is the second time that the US Supreme Court has been aske...
This article addresses the circuit split concerning the standard for corporate aiding and ...
This Essay considers the requirement of state action in suits brought against private corporations u...
This paper addresses complex legal issues in light of and in the context of Jesner v. Arab Bank, a c...
Since the landmark decision in Filártiga v. Pena-Irala, U.S. courts have struggled determining actio...
The topic of this panel is civil participation in the global trading system, with a particular focus...
This article challenges the widely held view that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) imposes liability on ...
This paper seeks to elucidate the fundamental sources of ATCA jurisprudence that have modernized the...
Because Kiobel removed corporate defendants from the scope of civil liability under the ATS, and be...
Contrary to the claims of some observers, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain...
The ATCA could be a powerful tool to promote corporate CSR, especially in developing countries where...
In the past thirty-five years, international human rights lawyers and, more recently, international ...
[Excerpt] On September 18, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a United States base...
This article explores whether transnational corporations or their executives can be held criminally ...
Courts continue to struggle with theories of liability for corporations under the Alien Tort Statute...
JESNER v Arab Bank plc 584 U.S. __ (2018) is the second time that the US Supreme Court has been aske...
This article addresses the circuit split concerning the standard for corporate aiding and ...
This Essay considers the requirement of state action in suits brought against private corporations u...
This paper addresses complex legal issues in light of and in the context of Jesner v. Arab Bank, a c...
Since the landmark decision in Filártiga v. Pena-Irala, U.S. courts have struggled determining actio...
The topic of this panel is civil participation in the global trading system, with a particular focus...
This article challenges the widely held view that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) imposes liability on ...
This paper seeks to elucidate the fundamental sources of ATCA jurisprudence that have modernized the...
Because Kiobel removed corporate defendants from the scope of civil liability under the ATS, and be...
Contrary to the claims of some observers, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain...
The ATCA could be a powerful tool to promote corporate CSR, especially in developing countries where...
In the past thirty-five years, international human rights lawyers and, more recently, international ...
[Excerpt] On September 18, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a United States base...
This article explores whether transnational corporations or their executives can be held criminally ...
Courts continue to struggle with theories of liability for corporations under the Alien Tort Statute...
JESNER v Arab Bank plc 584 U.S. __ (2018) is the second time that the US Supreme Court has been aske...
This article addresses the circuit split concerning the standard for corporate aiding and ...