Add to ORKGThis commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Maryland v. King, in which the Court may decide whether requiring an arrestee to submit to a buccal swab for identification purposes violates the arrestee\u27s privacy interests under the Fourth Amendment
This article addresses whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated when police surreptitiously collec...
This Article considers the advent of genetic genealogy, used by law enforcement in capturing the Gol...
On July 25, 2011, in United States v. Mitchell, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held...
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. S...
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court addressed whether forensic testing of DNA samples taken from ...
In Maryland v. King, 133 S. Ct. 1958 (2013), the Supreme Court narrowly upheld the constitutionality...
For nearly a decade, DNA-on-arrest laws eluded scrutiny in the courts. For another five years, they ...
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that when a suspect does not expressly limit consent to DNA te...
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court applied a balancing test to uphold a Maryland statute mandati...
With the advent of DNA testing, numerous issues have arisen with regard to obtaining and using evide...
In Part I, this article explores the challenges to privacy, personhood and probable cause raised by ...
F or readers who would like to review the truly momentous cases of the Supreme Court’s last Term, I ...
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that the doctrine of res judicata and Maryland Rule 4-704 do n...
Routine DNA sampling following a custodial arrest process is now the norm in many jurisdictions, but...
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers...
This article addresses whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated when police surreptitiously collec...
This Article considers the advent of genetic genealogy, used by law enforcement in capturing the Gol...
On July 25, 2011, in United States v. Mitchell, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held...
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. S...
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court addressed whether forensic testing of DNA samples taken from ...
In Maryland v. King, 133 S. Ct. 1958 (2013), the Supreme Court narrowly upheld the constitutionality...
For nearly a decade, DNA-on-arrest laws eluded scrutiny in the courts. For another five years, they ...
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that when a suspect does not expressly limit consent to DNA te...
In Maryland v. King, the Supreme Court applied a balancing test to uphold a Maryland statute mandati...
With the advent of DNA testing, numerous issues have arisen with regard to obtaining and using evide...
In Part I, this article explores the challenges to privacy, personhood and probable cause raised by ...
F or readers who would like to review the truly momentous cases of the Supreme Court’s last Term, I ...
The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that the doctrine of res judicata and Maryland Rule 4-704 do n...
Routine DNA sampling following a custodial arrest process is now the norm in many jurisdictions, but...
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers...
This article addresses whether the Fourth Amendment is implicated when police surreptitiously collec...
This Article considers the advent of genetic genealogy, used by law enforcement in capturing the Gol...
On July 25, 2011, in United States v. Mitchell, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held...