The High Court Wades into State-Law Water Allocation

Interstate water disputes have long been a mainstay of the Supreme Court\u27s original jurisdiction, the traditional forum for sovereign states to resolve their water wars peaceably. For over a century, these remained disputes between sovereigns: until 2010, when the Court permitted a private power company to intervene in such a dispute. The decision was an affront to state sovereign control of water resources, but its implications reach beyond dignitary concerns. Under the public trust doctrine, states have long held a fiduciary responsibility to allocate water resources within their borders in the interests of their citizens. As global climate change and the increasing demands of energy production continue to stress America\u27s water resources, the Court\u27s decision will further complicate states\u27 efforts to enact sound water policy for the future