This Article explores the difficulties that high technology markets pose for patent law and, in particular, for patent injunctions. It then outlines the ways in which “open source innovation” is unusually vulnerable to patent injunctions. It argues that courts can recognize this vulnerability, and respond to the particular competitive and innovative benefits of open source innovation, by flexibly applying the Supreme Court’s ruling in eBay v. MercExchange. Having dealt with the lamentable failure of the International Trade Commission to exercise a similar flexibility in its own patent jurisprudence, despite statutory and constitutional provisions that counsel otherwise, the Article concludes with some recommendations for reform
The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange is widely regarded as one of the most impo...
For years, high-tech companies have amassed patents in order to deter patent litigation. Recently, a...
Part I of this Article addresses the appropriateness of protecting Internet innovations under the cu...
This Article explores the difficulties that high technology markets pose for patent law and, in part...
Antitrust law and patent law share the common goal of improving economic welfare by facilitating com...
Courts, the Patent Office, and commentators are in vigorous disagreement about what types of innovat...
This Essay addresses one aspect of this legal and policy debate concerning remedies in patent law: h...
In eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court declared that an injunction granted to stop...
The current approach for determining when courts should award injunctions in patent disputes involve...
This article treats the injunction issuance standards announced in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, a...
Do patents promote innovation? Many in open innovation communities — or those that collaborate to cr...
In eflay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court declared that an injunction granted to sto...
Historically, intellectual property (IP) owners could rely on injunctive remedies to prevent continu...
An emerging rule in the district courts—thus far endorsed by the United States Court of Appeals for ...
In the United States, the Patent and Trademarks Office and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circ...
The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange is widely regarded as one of the most impo...
For years, high-tech companies have amassed patents in order to deter patent litigation. Recently, a...
Part I of this Article addresses the appropriateness of protecting Internet innovations under the cu...
This Article explores the difficulties that high technology markets pose for patent law and, in part...
Antitrust law and patent law share the common goal of improving economic welfare by facilitating com...
Courts, the Patent Office, and commentators are in vigorous disagreement about what types of innovat...
This Essay addresses one aspect of this legal and policy debate concerning remedies in patent law: h...
In eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court declared that an injunction granted to stop...
The current approach for determining when courts should award injunctions in patent disputes involve...
This article treats the injunction issuance standards announced in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, a...
Do patents promote innovation? Many in open innovation communities — or those that collaborate to cr...
In eflay, Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court declared that an injunction granted to sto...
Historically, intellectual property (IP) owners could rely on injunctive remedies to prevent continu...
An emerging rule in the district courts—thus far endorsed by the United States Court of Appeals for ...
In the United States, the Patent and Trademarks Office and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circ...
The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange is widely regarded as one of the most impo...
For years, high-tech companies have amassed patents in order to deter patent litigation. Recently, a...
Part I of this Article addresses the appropriateness of protecting Internet innovations under the cu...