The Supreme Court’s recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech shifts the balance of power in license agreements from patent holders to their licensees. This iBrief outlines the potential implications of the new rules on all stages of patent prosecution and protection. Further, it evaluates remedial contract provisions patent holders may include in future license agreements and how these provisions may mitigate the decision’s effects on preexisting commercial relationships
The diverse set of patent-related cases decided by the Supreme Court has demonstrated that the Court...
This Article proposes a more or less functional equivalent mechanism to a patent royalty stream thro...
Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment held that stare decisis required the Supreme Court to adhere to the h...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech shifts the balance of power in license...
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. asks whether Article III\u27s restriction on the jurisdiction of ...
The recent Supreme Court decision in MedImmune v. Genentech, resolved a jurisdictional question whil...
In 2007, the Supreme Court decided MedImmune v. Genentech. This decision changed the landscape of t...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech left patent owners who license out the...
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientif...
Supreme Court decisions regarding the doctrine of patent exhaustion have drawn a bright line for det...
Possibly in response to criticisms that the U.S. patent system affords too much legal protection to ...
Research Summary: Remedies for infringement are important determinants of the strength of patent pro...
In 2007 the Supreme Court reversed three patent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circ...
Patentees sometimes license their inventions through field-of-use licenses, which permit licensees t...
This Comment explores the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984. This statu...
The diverse set of patent-related cases decided by the Supreme Court has demonstrated that the Court...
This Article proposes a more or less functional equivalent mechanism to a patent royalty stream thro...
Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment held that stare decisis required the Supreme Court to adhere to the h...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech shifts the balance of power in license...
MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. asks whether Article III\u27s restriction on the jurisdiction of ...
The recent Supreme Court decision in MedImmune v. Genentech, resolved a jurisdictional question whil...
In 2007, the Supreme Court decided MedImmune v. Genentech. This decision changed the landscape of t...
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in MedImmune v. Genentech left patent owners who license out the...
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientif...
Supreme Court decisions regarding the doctrine of patent exhaustion have drawn a bright line for det...
Possibly in response to criticisms that the U.S. patent system affords too much legal protection to ...
Research Summary: Remedies for infringement are important determinants of the strength of patent pro...
In 2007 the Supreme Court reversed three patent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circ...
Patentees sometimes license their inventions through field-of-use licenses, which permit licensees t...
This Comment explores the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984. This statu...
The diverse set of patent-related cases decided by the Supreme Court has demonstrated that the Court...
This Article proposes a more or less functional equivalent mechanism to a patent royalty stream thro...
Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment held that stare decisis required the Supreme Court to adhere to the h...