Add to ORKGThe author assesses the physicians\u27 immunity statute from legal policy, ethical, and financial perspectives, and concludes that alternatives such as licensure and monetary incentives would better serve the goal of encouraging invention more effectively by rewarding it
Dr. X is a young, charismatic, board-certified surgeon at the local hospital. While popular among he...
In this extract from "Principles of Medical Law", Laurie considers the current state of play regardi...
The U.S. Supreme Court effectively redefined the scope of patent eligible subject matter when it dec...
The author assesses the physicians\u27 immunity statute from legal policy, ethical, and financial ...
When the Physician's Immunity Statute was enacted in 1997, its statutory language and legislative hi...
This article explores whether the current patent system strikes the optimal balance between providin...
In theory, a patent provides a monopoly over a product or a process in return for the disclosure of ...
This Comment explores the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984. This statu...
Patent monopolies are tolerated because we believe they promote progress that benefits society. What...
On March 20, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously decided the case of Mayo Colla...
A patent consists of only one right: the right to exclude others from practicing the patented invent...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Riegel v. Medtronic immunized medical device manufacturers from c...
There is debate among scholars as to whether patent law provides more benefit than harm. Some studie...
The legal issues involved in technology application are inextricably interwoven with the medical iss...
Current academic and policy debates focus on the impact of tort reforms on physicians’ behavior and ...
Dr. X is a young, charismatic, board-certified surgeon at the local hospital. While popular among he...
In this extract from "Principles of Medical Law", Laurie considers the current state of play regardi...
The U.S. Supreme Court effectively redefined the scope of patent eligible subject matter when it dec...
The author assesses the physicians\u27 immunity statute from legal policy, ethical, and financial ...
When the Physician's Immunity Statute was enacted in 1997, its statutory language and legislative hi...
This article explores whether the current patent system strikes the optimal balance between providin...
In theory, a patent provides a monopoly over a product or a process in return for the disclosure of ...
This Comment explores the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984. This statu...
Patent monopolies are tolerated because we believe they promote progress that benefits society. What...
On March 20, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously decided the case of Mayo Colla...
A patent consists of only one right: the right to exclude others from practicing the patented invent...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Riegel v. Medtronic immunized medical device manufacturers from c...
There is debate among scholars as to whether patent law provides more benefit than harm. Some studie...
The legal issues involved in technology application are inextricably interwoven with the medical iss...
Current academic and policy debates focus on the impact of tort reforms on physicians’ behavior and ...
Dr. X is a young, charismatic, board-certified surgeon at the local hospital. While popular among he...
In this extract from "Principles of Medical Law", Laurie considers the current state of play regardi...
The U.S. Supreme Court effectively redefined the scope of patent eligible subject matter when it dec...