A comment on an article by Peterson and Selvin dealing with the role of courts as participants in the resolution of mass tort cases is presented
(1) The paper by Cameron and Kornhauser[2005] is the second in a line that attempts to explain the f...
The following essay is the pre-editing draft of the introduction to a paper delivered at a Mass Tort...
This foreword gives a brief background on the panel discussion to ensue, which illustrates the dilem...
Mark Peterson\u27s and Molly Selvin\u27s interesting article, Mass Justice: The Limited and Unlimite...
A comment on Judith Resnik\u27s article on the aggregation of civil cases is presented. The goals of...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
This Article explores a central theme that ties together rationales to exit aggregation of tort clai...
The lead article for this issue is an introduction to understanding court culture. In our last issue...
Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism,1 by Kevin Clermont and Theodore Eisenberg, is not o...
The judicial disciplinary process and the specter of politically motivated misconduct allegations ag...
The potential for attorneys to collude in reaching a settlement agreement arises in any large-scal...
The American legal system has witnessed a gradual, almost surreptitious, movement toward collective...
The majority opinion in the Illinois Supreme Court held that if a change was to be made, the task wa...
No procedural topic has garnered more attention in the past fifty years than the class action and ag...
Rather than characterizing a collective judicial view, this article attempts to discern some trends...
(1) The paper by Cameron and Kornhauser[2005] is the second in a line that attempts to explain the f...
The following essay is the pre-editing draft of the introduction to a paper delivered at a Mass Tort...
This foreword gives a brief background on the panel discussion to ensue, which illustrates the dilem...
Mark Peterson\u27s and Molly Selvin\u27s interesting article, Mass Justice: The Limited and Unlimite...
A comment on Judith Resnik\u27s article on the aggregation of civil cases is presented. The goals of...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
This Article explores a central theme that ties together rationales to exit aggregation of tort clai...
The lead article for this issue is an introduction to understanding court culture. In our last issue...
Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism,1 by Kevin Clermont and Theodore Eisenberg, is not o...
The judicial disciplinary process and the specter of politically motivated misconduct allegations ag...
The potential for attorneys to collude in reaching a settlement agreement arises in any large-scal...
The American legal system has witnessed a gradual, almost surreptitious, movement toward collective...
The majority opinion in the Illinois Supreme Court held that if a change was to be made, the task wa...
No procedural topic has garnered more attention in the past fifty years than the class action and ag...
Rather than characterizing a collective judicial view, this article attempts to discern some trends...
(1) The paper by Cameron and Kornhauser[2005] is the second in a line that attempts to explain the f...
The following essay is the pre-editing draft of the introduction to a paper delivered at a Mass Tort...
This foreword gives a brief background on the panel discussion to ensue, which illustrates the dilem...