Add to ORKGIn 1968, the Second Circuit decided Schoenbaum vs Firstbrook, a doctrinally significant case for two reasons. The initial panel decision found, among other things, that the allegedly fraudulent mismanagement of a foreign company had sufficient effects in the US to trigger the assertion of US subject matter jurisdiction. It is argued that as a result of the forces creating an internationalized securities marketplace, the prevailing extraterritoriality doctrine has become both useless and problematic
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
The antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may apply...
This note will suggest that the holding in Continental Grain repre- sents an unjustifiably expansiv...
In 1968, the Second Circuit decided Schoenbaum vs Firstbrook, a doctrinally significant case for t...
The U.S. Supreme Court in Morrison held that Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act did not apply extrate...
The federal securities laws, and the 1934 Act in particular, have only recently been applied to tran...
[Excerpt] “As securities fraud has grown increasingly transnational, it has become necessary to expa...
The principal antifraud provision of securities law in the United States is rule lOb-5. Fraud consis...
With globalization, securities markets have become increasingly interconnected, and securities fraud...
In an attempt to halt bribery of foreign officials by American businesses, the Foreign Corrupt Pract...
This paper examines the factors that affect the decision of U.S. companies to issue securities offsh...
In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2010 that securities fr...
This draft working paper, prepared for a French academic forum entitled “American Law Today: Identit...
The capital markets within the United States are among the larg- est in the world. Today, the combi...
In August 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of United States v. Vilar de...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
The antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may apply...
This note will suggest that the holding in Continental Grain repre- sents an unjustifiably expansiv...
In 1968, the Second Circuit decided Schoenbaum vs Firstbrook, a doctrinally significant case for t...
The U.S. Supreme Court in Morrison held that Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act did not apply extrate...
The federal securities laws, and the 1934 Act in particular, have only recently been applied to tran...
[Excerpt] “As securities fraud has grown increasingly transnational, it has become necessary to expa...
The principal antifraud provision of securities law in the United States is rule lOb-5. Fraud consis...
With globalization, securities markets have become increasingly interconnected, and securities fraud...
In an attempt to halt bribery of foreign officials by American businesses, the Foreign Corrupt Pract...
This paper examines the factors that affect the decision of U.S. companies to issue securities offsh...
In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2010 that securities fr...
This draft working paper, prepared for a French academic forum entitled “American Law Today: Identit...
The capital markets within the United States are among the larg- est in the world. Today, the combi...
In August 2013, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in the case of United States v. Vilar de...
Recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court as to the international reach of American antitr...
The antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may apply...
This note will suggest that the holding in Continental Grain repre- sents an unjustifiably expansiv...