Add to ORKGTsai examines the ways in which the US Supreme Court uses language to signal its authority. One technique of the Court is to frequently use the image of institutional conflict within its rulings
Considerable recent scholarship in law, the social sciences, and literary theory has explored the wa...
The inherent ambiguity of language vests in the United States Supreme Court considerable power to sh...
What status do Supreme Court decisions have for officials in the political branches of our governmen...
The essay strives for a better understanding of the myths, symbols, categories of power, and images ...
Perhaps nowhere in American life is the intersection of language, argumentation, and politics more i...
This paper has two purposes: (1) to create a new theory of meaning in language philosophy; and (2) t...
Rhetorical scholars have long advocated for the study of legal discourse because of the “centrality ...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2011. Major: Political science. Advisor: Timothy...
This dissertation engages previous research in political science and psychology by arguing for the i...
This article analyzes legal language through the rhetorical, argumentative and narrative structures ...
Culture plays a part in the construction of legal understandings in the Supreme Court contrary to mu...
This symposium essay explores the legacy of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johanns v. Livestock Mkt...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2016. Major: Political Science. Advisor: Timothy Jo...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
Students of linguistics and psychology demonstrate that word choices people make convey information ...
Considerable recent scholarship in law, the social sciences, and literary theory has explored the wa...
The inherent ambiguity of language vests in the United States Supreme Court considerable power to sh...
What status do Supreme Court decisions have for officials in the political branches of our governmen...
The essay strives for a better understanding of the myths, symbols, categories of power, and images ...
Perhaps nowhere in American life is the intersection of language, argumentation, and politics more i...
This paper has two purposes: (1) to create a new theory of meaning in language philosophy; and (2) t...
Rhetorical scholars have long advocated for the study of legal discourse because of the “centrality ...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. October 2011. Major: Political science. Advisor: Timothy...
This dissertation engages previous research in political science and psychology by arguing for the i...
This article analyzes legal language through the rhetorical, argumentative and narrative structures ...
Culture plays a part in the construction of legal understandings in the Supreme Court contrary to mu...
This symposium essay explores the legacy of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johanns v. Livestock Mkt...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. June 2016. Major: Political Science. Advisor: Timothy Jo...
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acc...
Students of linguistics and psychology demonstrate that word choices people make convey information ...
Considerable recent scholarship in law, the social sciences, and literary theory has explored the wa...
The inherent ambiguity of language vests in the United States Supreme Court considerable power to sh...
What status do Supreme Court decisions have for officials in the political branches of our governmen...