Add to ORKGFollowing the United States\u27 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq,\u27 the US government argued that the successor government in Iraq was not responsible for Iraq\u27s Saddam-era debt under the purported doctrine of odious-regime debt. This purported doctrine apparently excused--by operation of law--all successor regimes from repaying debts that were incurred by oppressive predecessor regimes. Here, Cheng presents three-part response regarding the purported rule that oppressive debts of a predecessor government do not bind its successor
Odious regimes have always been there. That there is no silver-bullet solution that will prevent odi...
Feibelman focuses on two particular doctrines of lender liability-equitable subordination and fraudu...
This Article looks at the generally agreed upon characteristics of the odious debt doctrine and co...
Following the United States\u27 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq,\u27 the US government ar...
The odious debt doctrine has experienced renewed popularity in the past few years; it has been heral...
The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 revived public and academic debate about a wobbly old doctrine of in...
Politicians as well as many members of the international human-rights community, view the odious deb...
Iraq is paying off debt from Saddam Hussein’s rule. South Africa is paying off debt obligations incu...
Backer examines how the traditional notion of odious debt as a method of repudiating sovereign debt ...
Odious debt is more of a literature than a doctrine. Going back to at least the 1920s, one can find ...
Sovereigns incur debts, and creditors look to the law to hold sovereigns to their obligations. In le...
In a sense, all debts are odious; that is, to use dictionary definitions, hateful; disgusting; offe...
To most people, the notion that the citizens of a country lucky enough to have ousted a dictator sho...
Choi and Posner indicate that it is unclear whether the doctrine will improve the welfare of the pop...
The few years since the U.S. incursion into Iraq in 2003 have witnessed an explosion in the literatu...
Odious regimes have always been there. That there is no silver-bullet solution that will prevent odi...
Feibelman focuses on two particular doctrines of lender liability-equitable subordination and fraudu...
This Article looks at the generally agreed upon characteristics of the odious debt doctrine and co...
Following the United States\u27 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq,\u27 the US government ar...
The odious debt doctrine has experienced renewed popularity in the past few years; it has been heral...
The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 revived public and academic debate about a wobbly old doctrine of in...
Politicians as well as many members of the international human-rights community, view the odious deb...
Iraq is paying off debt from Saddam Hussein’s rule. South Africa is paying off debt obligations incu...
Backer examines how the traditional notion of odious debt as a method of repudiating sovereign debt ...
Odious debt is more of a literature than a doctrine. Going back to at least the 1920s, one can find ...
Sovereigns incur debts, and creditors look to the law to hold sovereigns to their obligations. In le...
In a sense, all debts are odious; that is, to use dictionary definitions, hateful; disgusting; offe...
To most people, the notion that the citizens of a country lucky enough to have ousted a dictator sho...
Choi and Posner indicate that it is unclear whether the doctrine will improve the welfare of the pop...
The few years since the U.S. incursion into Iraq in 2003 have witnessed an explosion in the literatu...
Odious regimes have always been there. That there is no silver-bullet solution that will prevent odi...
Feibelman focuses on two particular doctrines of lender liability-equitable subordination and fraudu...
This Article looks at the generally agreed upon characteristics of the odious debt doctrine and co...