Recent revisions of rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure removed certain restrictive interpretations which had been engrafted upon the old form. New rule 24(a)(2) states that a party may intervene of right in an action when he possesses an interest which may be substantially impaired by a determination in the proceeding, and he is not adequately represented by an existing party. In the first Supreme Court application of the new rule, the Court intimated that even in an antitrust context a pecuniary or possessory interest is not required for intervention. The Court failed, however, to delineate the representation requirement and the case may be of limited precedential value because of the clear nature of the government misconduct ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure delegates to private parties state authority to co...
The codification of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 (the “Federal Rules”) created not o...
In 1935, the Attorney General brought a suit in equity to enforce the antitrust laws, charging Colum...
Litigation which Chayes labeled “public law litigation” grew especially quickly in the decade immedi...
The Supreme Court recently decided in Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc. that intervenors of ri...
The Supreme Court has rarely considered what applicants must show to intervene as of right under Fed...
Intervention under Rule 24 has been judicially construed in light of the 1966 Amendment to a loose b...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
Plaintiff instituted a civil antitrust suit against defendant in 1956. After numerous pre-trial conf...
This Note argues that Congress should amend the APPA to require a judicial public interest determina...
The United States brought an action against defendants, movie distributors and producers, for allege...
Certification of Rule 23(b)(3) antitrust class actions has consumed large amounts of legal energy, w...
The public interest litigant is no longer a nascent phenomenon in American jurisprudence. Born of th...
Plaintiffs brought a treble damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act alleging violations by ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure delegates to private parties state authority to co...
The codification of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 (the “Federal Rules”) created not o...
In 1935, the Attorney General brought a suit in equity to enforce the antitrust laws, charging Colum...
Litigation which Chayes labeled “public law litigation” grew especially quickly in the decade immedi...
The Supreme Court recently decided in Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc. that intervenors of ri...
The Supreme Court has rarely considered what applicants must show to intervene as of right under Fed...
Intervention under Rule 24 has been judicially construed in light of the 1966 Amendment to a loose b...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
Plaintiff instituted a civil antitrust suit against defendant in 1956. After numerous pre-trial conf...
This Note argues that Congress should amend the APPA to require a judicial public interest determina...
The United States brought an action against defendants, movie distributors and producers, for allege...
Certification of Rule 23(b)(3) antitrust class actions has consumed large amounts of legal energy, w...
The public interest litigant is no longer a nascent phenomenon in American jurisprudence. Born of th...
Plaintiffs brought a treble damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act alleging violations by ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure delegates to private parties state authority to co...
The codification of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 (the “Federal Rules”) created not o...