Until relatively recently, judicial selection did not stir up much interest outside the United States. However, with the increase in judicial power in courts around the world, the process of judicial selection has received more attention. Debates about possible reforms to the selection process have emerged on the political agenda of many countries (Malleson 2006, 10). These debates tend to revolve around two major dimensions. First, how desirable is it to have political input into the selection process compared to a process that is more insulated from partisan or electoral race, language, religion, region, or disability) emphasized in the selection process
The importance of lower federal courts in the policymaking process has stimulated extensive research...
Throughout America’s history, there has been protracted debate over the best method of selecting jud...
In this Article, I undertake an evaluation of a method of judicial selection known as "merit selecti...
Until relatively recently, judicial selection did not stir up much interest outside the United State...
This article offers a brief comparative look at American and British jurisprudential pending selecti...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
This paper summarizes insights from political science and empirical legal scholarship concerning sel...
Judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) are prominent jurists of high merit. However, lit...
The Symposium entitled Judicial Professionalism in a New Era of Judicial Selection, held on Octobe...
Using a data set capturing the ideological positioning of nearly half a million US judges and lawyer...
A recurring constitutional controversy of great practical and political importance concerns the cr...
For over two centuries Americans have debated whether judges should be elected or appointed. While t...
This Article evaluates what we know about the politics of international judicial appointments and id...
American states have experimented with different methods of judicial selection for two centuries, cr...
State judiciaries are foundational institutions of governance in the United States. They are coequal...
The importance of lower federal courts in the policymaking process has stimulated extensive research...
Throughout America’s history, there has been protracted debate over the best method of selecting jud...
In this Article, I undertake an evaluation of a method of judicial selection known as "merit selecti...
Until relatively recently, judicial selection did not stir up much interest outside the United State...
This article offers a brief comparative look at American and British jurisprudential pending selecti...
The scholarly debate about how to select state judges has been ongoing for decades; the public debat...
This paper summarizes insights from political science and empirical legal scholarship concerning sel...
Judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) are prominent jurists of high merit. However, lit...
The Symposium entitled Judicial Professionalism in a New Era of Judicial Selection, held on Octobe...
Using a data set capturing the ideological positioning of nearly half a million US judges and lawyer...
A recurring constitutional controversy of great practical and political importance concerns the cr...
For over two centuries Americans have debated whether judges should be elected or appointed. While t...
This Article evaluates what we know about the politics of international judicial appointments and id...
American states have experimented with different methods of judicial selection for two centuries, cr...
State judiciaries are foundational institutions of governance in the United States. They are coequal...
The importance of lower federal courts in the policymaking process has stimulated extensive research...
Throughout America’s history, there has been protracted debate over the best method of selecting jud...
In this Article, I undertake an evaluation of a method of judicial selection known as "merit selecti...