Louise of Savoy, mother of Francis I, and Catherine de Medici, mother of the last three reigning Valois kings—Francis II, Charles IX, and Henry III—were two sixteenth-century women whose maternity gave them access to power and provided the foundation for their claims to exercise it legitimately. While their contemporaries either accepted or contested those claims, some nineteenth-century critics vehemently rejected female rule, particularly by mothers. Modern scholars have left those nineteenth-century repudiations largely unquestioned
Many women formerly regarded as harridans, vixens, or worse by historians throughout the ages have b...
Catherine and Marie de Medici, as well as Anne of Austria, we re abnormalities on the 16yh and 17th-...
Using the liminal space of their métier, royal mistresses created opportunities for themselves using...
Modern historians have found it difficult to disrupt the narrative inherited from past scholars, who...
The death of Henri IV in 1610 abruptly reopened a key political debate for the Guise and their socia...
Catherine de’ Medici is commonly known and referred to by historians as an “Evil queen”. This paper ...
On the surface, Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette had much in common. Each was the youngest daugh...
Women and their relationship to sovereignty, during the early modern era has become a rapidly growin...
Between 1299 and 1369 there was a continuous succession of queen consorts and queen dowagers. Marga...
Though previous studies on the political career of Catherine de\u27 Medici have been male-centric, f...
Marie Antoinette of France and Maria Carolina of Naples, both consorts, contributed to a flourishing...
Much ink has been spilled in service of Henry VIII and his veritable parade of wives, but not nearly...
This paper considers the factors which enabled women to access power via developing mechanisms for r...
The turbulent events of the Fronde des Princes (Fronde of the Princes), which saw the French nobilit...
The royal courts of early modern Europe (circa 1500 – 1800, depending on region) were a key structur...
Many women formerly regarded as harridans, vixens, or worse by historians throughout the ages have b...
Catherine and Marie de Medici, as well as Anne of Austria, we re abnormalities on the 16yh and 17th-...
Using the liminal space of their métier, royal mistresses created opportunities for themselves using...
Modern historians have found it difficult to disrupt the narrative inherited from past scholars, who...
The death of Henri IV in 1610 abruptly reopened a key political debate for the Guise and their socia...
Catherine de’ Medici is commonly known and referred to by historians as an “Evil queen”. This paper ...
On the surface, Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette had much in common. Each was the youngest daugh...
Women and their relationship to sovereignty, during the early modern era has become a rapidly growin...
Between 1299 and 1369 there was a continuous succession of queen consorts and queen dowagers. Marga...
Though previous studies on the political career of Catherine de\u27 Medici have been male-centric, f...
Marie Antoinette of France and Maria Carolina of Naples, both consorts, contributed to a flourishing...
Much ink has been spilled in service of Henry VIII and his veritable parade of wives, but not nearly...
This paper considers the factors which enabled women to access power via developing mechanisms for r...
The turbulent events of the Fronde des Princes (Fronde of the Princes), which saw the French nobilit...
The royal courts of early modern Europe (circa 1500 – 1800, depending on region) were a key structur...
Many women formerly regarded as harridans, vixens, or worse by historians throughout the ages have b...
Catherine and Marie de Medici, as well as Anne of Austria, we re abnormalities on the 16yh and 17th-...
Using the liminal space of their métier, royal mistresses created opportunities for themselves using...