This response to papers by Leah Ceccarelli, Randy Harris, and Carl Herndl and Lauren Cutlip in the “Horizons of Possibility” panel at the 2012 ARST Vicentennial conference raises questions about each of the visions as they relate, respectively, to ARST audiences, brain science, and sustainable planets and programs. It also suggests renewed attention to communication technologies by scholars studying the rhetoric of science and technology, maintaining that rhetoricians need to come to terms with emerging twenty-first century communicative forms
This paper discusses three position papers presented at the vicentennial conference of the Associati...
We argue that the rhetoric of science occupies an important niche in contemporary science studies. A...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
This response to papers by Leah Ceccarelli, Randy Harris, and Carl Herndl and Lauren Cutlip in the “...
In this short response to the papers in the “Horizons of Possibility” group, I first identify a dial...
These papers show us several horizons, one deep inside the brain, one beyond the ivory tower, and a ...
A review of work being published in our journals establishes that we most often think of ourselves a...
Contemporary concerns about public engagement in science communication collaboratives are a pressing...
Abstract: The set of rhetorical engagements in science, technology and medicine presented at the 201...
Growing attention to a rift between epistemology and ontology, between words and things, sets new ch...
Leaders of the science establishment are seeking help with communicating science to the public. Rhet...
The purpose of this capstone is to identify rhetoric in public-facing science communication, and to ...
There is a necessary and growing preoccupation in rhetoric of science with the real-world consequenc...
By analyzing three case studies (neutrinos, victimization survey and quality of mass media), our pre...
Rhetoricians involved in funded collaborative research with scientists have discussed some of their ...
This paper discusses three position papers presented at the vicentennial conference of the Associati...
We argue that the rhetoric of science occupies an important niche in contemporary science studies. A...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
This response to papers by Leah Ceccarelli, Randy Harris, and Carl Herndl and Lauren Cutlip in the “...
In this short response to the papers in the “Horizons of Possibility” group, I first identify a dial...
These papers show us several horizons, one deep inside the brain, one beyond the ivory tower, and a ...
A review of work being published in our journals establishes that we most often think of ourselves a...
Contemporary concerns about public engagement in science communication collaboratives are a pressing...
Abstract: The set of rhetorical engagements in science, technology and medicine presented at the 201...
Growing attention to a rift between epistemology and ontology, between words and things, sets new ch...
Leaders of the science establishment are seeking help with communicating science to the public. Rhet...
The purpose of this capstone is to identify rhetoric in public-facing science communication, and to ...
There is a necessary and growing preoccupation in rhetoric of science with the real-world consequenc...
By analyzing three case studies (neutrinos, victimization survey and quality of mass media), our pre...
Rhetoricians involved in funded collaborative research with scientists have discussed some of their ...
This paper discusses three position papers presented at the vicentennial conference of the Associati...
We argue that the rhetoric of science occupies an important niche in contemporary science studies. A...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...