This paper attempts to clarify some issues about what is usually called "doxastic voluntarism". This phrase often hides a confusion between two separate (although connected) issues: whether belief is or can be, as a matter of psychological fact, under the control of the will, on the one hand, and whether we can have practical reasons to believe something, or whether our beliefs are subject to any sort of "ought", on the other hand. The first issue is psychological, and I take the answer to be negative. The second issue is normative, and the answer that I give is a qualified 'yes'. Belief is not a matter of the will, although there are certain things that we ought to believe. (edited
According to the deontological conception of epistemic justification, a belief is justified when it ...
The term of ethics of belief is appeared for the first time in Clifford's well-known essay by the sa...
Is there a sense in which we exercise direct volitional control over our beliefs? Most agree that th...
I argue that one should not confuse two issues about the relationship between belief and the will: t...
Pragmatists have argued that doxastic or epistemic norms do not apply to beliefs, but to changes of ...
A person presented with adequate but not conclusive evidence for a proposition is in a position volu...
In this paper I address the question about whether beliefs can be voluntary, and about whether a neg...
This paper defends direct activism – the view that it is possible to form beliefs in a causally dire...
Most of the literature on doxastic voluntarism has concentrated on the question of the voluntariness...
This paper addresses some connections between conceptions of the will and the theory of practical re...
The point of departure of this paper is a conception of faith that is broader than traditional conce...
Do we ever have an obligation to choose to hold beliefs, religious or otherwise? The relations betw...
Direct Doxastic Voluntarism � the notion that we have direct (un-mediated) voluntary control over ou...
This paper concerns a problem that has received insufficient analysis in the philosophical literatur...
Many assume that we can be responsible only what is voluntary. This leads to puzzlement about our re...
According to the deontological conception of epistemic justification, a belief is justified when it ...
The term of ethics of belief is appeared for the first time in Clifford's well-known essay by the sa...
Is there a sense in which we exercise direct volitional control over our beliefs? Most agree that th...
I argue that one should not confuse two issues about the relationship between belief and the will: t...
Pragmatists have argued that doxastic or epistemic norms do not apply to beliefs, but to changes of ...
A person presented with adequate but not conclusive evidence for a proposition is in a position volu...
In this paper I address the question about whether beliefs can be voluntary, and about whether a neg...
This paper defends direct activism – the view that it is possible to form beliefs in a causally dire...
Most of the literature on doxastic voluntarism has concentrated on the question of the voluntariness...
This paper addresses some connections between conceptions of the will and the theory of practical re...
The point of departure of this paper is a conception of faith that is broader than traditional conce...
Do we ever have an obligation to choose to hold beliefs, religious or otherwise? The relations betw...
Direct Doxastic Voluntarism � the notion that we have direct (un-mediated) voluntary control over ou...
This paper concerns a problem that has received insufficient analysis in the philosophical literatur...
Many assume that we can be responsible only what is voluntary. This leads to puzzlement about our re...
According to the deontological conception of epistemic justification, a belief is justified when it ...
The term of ethics of belief is appeared for the first time in Clifford's well-known essay by the sa...
Is there a sense in which we exercise direct volitional control over our beliefs? Most agree that th...