The maintenance of quality and integrity in clinical and basic science research depends upon peer review. This process has stood the test of time and has evolved to meet increasing work loads, and ways of detecting fraud in the scientific community. However, in the 21st century, the emphasis on evidence-based medicine and good science has placed pressure on the ways in which the peer review system is used by most journals. This paper reviews the peer review system and the problems it faces in the digital age, and proposes possible solutions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:436-41
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleFor centuries, peer review has...
The use of independent peer reviewers, to obtain advice from experts knowledgeable in a particular r...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review – processes of quality control and certification – is well established in most sciences....
Abstract The quality and integrity of the scientific literature have recently become the subject of ...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review is a widely accepted instrument for raising the quality of science. Peer review limits t...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
et al.Peer review is pivotal to science and academia, as it represents a widely accepted strategy fo...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleFor centuries, peer review has...
The use of independent peer reviewers, to obtain advice from experts knowledgeable in a particular r...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
From today's viewpoint it seems almost inconceivable that there once was a time where academia funct...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of i...
Peer review – processes of quality control and certification – is well established in most sciences....
Abstract The quality and integrity of the scientific literature have recently become the subject of ...
Peer review process helps in evaluating and validating of research that is published in the journals...
Peer review is a widely accepted instrument for raising the quality of science. Peer review limits t...
Peer review is a practice used in the evaluation of scientific and scholarly papers in order to sele...
et al.Peer review is pivotal to science and academia, as it represents a widely accepted strategy fo...
There is little dispute that peer review will remain as a means of quality control and certification...
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 pa...
Full list of author information is available at the end of the articleFor centuries, peer review has...