The diocesans tryall. Wherein all the sinnews of D. Dovvnames Defence are brought unto three heads, and orderly dissolved. By M. Paul Baynes.

A reply against M. Gilbert Brovvne priest Wherein is handled many of the greatest and weightiest pointes of controuersie betweene vs and the papists, and the truth of our doctrine clearely proued, and the falset of their religion and doctrine laide open, and most euidentlie conuicted and confuted, by the testimonies of the Scripture and auncient fathers; and also by some of their own popes, doctors, cardinals, and of their owne writters. Whereunto is anexed a seuerall treatise, concerning the masse and Antichrist. By M. Iohn Welsche, preacher of Christs Gospell at Aire.

Welch, John, 1568?-1622.
Browne, Gilbert, d. 1612.

January 1602

[36], 363, [1] p.At foot of title: Cum priuilegio regio.Prints for the first time Welch's original l...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

Ames, William, 1576-1633.

January 1633

[124], 156; 531, [13]; 64 p. : port.Attributed to William Ames in the advertisement to the reader.A ...

A defence of the sermon preached at the consecration of the L. Bishop of Bath and VVelles against a confutation thereof by a namelesse author. Diuided into 4. bookes: the first, prouing chiefly that the lay or onely-gouerning elders haue no warrant either in the Scriptures or other monuments of antiquity. The second, shewing that the primitiue churches indued with power of ecclesiasticall gouernment, were not parishes properly but dioceses, and consequently that the angels of the churches or ancient bishops were not parishionall but diocesan bishops. The third, defending the superioritie of bishops aboue other ministers, and prouing that bishops alwayes had a prioritie not onely in order, but also in degree, and a maioritie of power both for ordination and iurisdiction. The fourth, maintayning that the episcopall function is of apostolicall and diuine institution.

Downame, George, d. 1634.

January 1611

[12], 238, [2], 148, 154, 168, [2] p.A defense of Downame's "A sermon defending the honourable funct...

Second part of a reply, answering a defence of a sermon preached at the consecration of the bishop of Bathe and Welles, by George Downame, Doctor of Divinitie.

Sheerwood, Rihcard,

[12], 293, [1]; [8], 164 p.A reply answering Downame's "A defence of the sermon preached at the cons...

An ansvvere to a sermon preached the 17 of April anno D. 1608, by George Downame Doctour of Divinitie and intituled, A sermon defendinge the honorable function of bishops wherein; all his reasons, brought to prove the honorable function of our L. Bishops, to be of divine institution; are answered and refuted.

January 1609

58, [2]; 166 p.Misattributed to John Rainolds. MS note by James Kennedy on copy in New College, Edin...

A sermon preached at Pauls Crosse, the 25. of Nouember. 1621 Vpon occasion of that false and scandalous report (lately printed) touching the supposed apostasie of the right Reuerend Father in God, Iohn King, late Lord Bishop of London. By Henry King, his eldest sonne. Whereunto is annexed the examination, and answere of Thomas Preston, p. taken before my Lords Grace of Canterbury, touching this scandall. Published by authority.

King, Henry, 1592-1669.
Preston, Thomas, 1563-1640.

January 1621

[8], 77, [11] p.A reply to a statement in: Broughton, Richard. English protestants plea, and petitio...

The diocesans tryall wherein all the sinnewes of Doctor Dovvnhams defence are brought into three heads, and orderly dissolved / by M. Paul Baynes ; published by Dr. William Amis ...

Baynes, Paul, d. 1617.
Ames, William, d. 1662.

[12], 89 p."The preface" signed: W. Ames.Date of publication from Wing.Reproduction of original in C...

A treatise of the authority of the church. The summe wherof was delivered in a sermon preached at Belfast, at the visitation of the diocese of Downe and Conner the tenth day of August 1636. By Henrie Leslie bishop of the diocese. Intended for the satisfaction of them who in those places oppose the orders of our church, and since published upon occasion of a libell sent abroad in writing, wherin this sermon, and all his proceedings are most falsely traduced. Together with an answer to certaine objections made against the orders of our church, especially kneeling at the communion.

Leslie, Henry, 1580-1661.

January 1637

[16], 190, [2] p.A sermon.With a final errata leaf.Reproduction of the original in Cambridge Univers...

A ioynt attestation, avowing that the discipline of the Church of England was not impeached by the Synode of Dort

Balcanquhall, Walter, 1586?-1645. aut
Carleton, George, 1559-1628. aut

January 1626

[4], 26, [2] p.Signed "Georgius Cicestriensis Episcopus. Iohannes Sarisburiensis Episcopus. Gualteru...

A defence of the churches and ministery of Englande.

Johnson, Francis, 1562-1618.
Jacob, Henry, 1563-1624.

January 1600

[28], 217, [3] p.Reprints and answers Jacob, Henry. "A defence of the churches and ministery of Eng...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 3

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1609

[8], 184, 183-385, [1], 80, 91-108 p.A reply to: Bishop, William. The second part of The reformatio...

A reproofe of M. Doct. Abbots defence, of the Catholike deformed by M. W. Perkins Wherein his sundry abuses of Gods sacred word, and most manifold mangling, misaplying, and falsifying, the auncient Fathers sentences,be so plainely discouered, euen to the eye of euery indifferent reader, that whosoeuer hath any due care of his owne saluation, can neuer hereafter giue him more credit, in matter of faith and religion. The first part. Made by W.P.B. and Doct. in diuinty.

Bishop, William, 1554?-1624.

January 1608

287 p.W.P.B. = William Bishop.No more published.A reply to (STC 48): Abbot, Robert. A defence of th...

Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annext to the sermon, entituled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.

Love, Christopher, 1618-1651.

January 1647

[6], 33, [1], 33-44 p.A reply to: Dell, William. Right reformation."A short answer to an unlicensed...

A defence of the answer and arguments of the synod met at Boston in the year 1662 concerning the subject of Baptism and consociation of churches against the reply made thereto, by the Reverend Mr. John Davenport, pastor of the church at New-Haven, in his treatise entituled Another essay for investigation of the truth &c. : together with an answer to the apologetical preface set before that essay, by some of the elders who were members of the Synod above-mentioned.

Mather, Richard, 1596-1669.

January 1664

46, 102 p.Imperfect: p. 1-4 lacking."An answer" attributed to Jonathan Mitchel, A.M. of Cambridge , ...

A reply against M. Gilbert Brovvne priest Wherein is handled many of the greatest and weightiest pointes of controuersie betweene vs and the papists, and the truth of our doctrine clearely proued, and the falset of their religion and doctrine laide open, and most euidentlie conuicted and confuted, by the testimonies of the Scripture and auncient fathers; and also by some of their own popes, doctors, cardinals, and of their owne writters. Whereunto is anexed a seuerall treatise, concerning the masse and Antichrist. By M. Iohn Welsche, preacher of Christs Gospell at Aire.

Welch, John, 1568?-1622.
Browne, Gilbert, d. 1612.

January 1602

[36], 363, [1] p.At foot of title: Cum priuilegio regio.Prints for the first time Welch's original l...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

Ames, William, 1576-1633.

January 1633

[124], 156; 531, [13]; 64 p. : port.Attributed to William Ames in the advertisement to the reader.A ...

A defence of the sermon preached at the consecration of the L. Bishop of Bath and VVelles against a confutation thereof by a namelesse author. Diuided into 4. bookes: the first, prouing chiefly that the lay or onely-gouerning elders haue no warrant either in the Scriptures or other monuments of antiquity. The second, shewing that the primitiue churches indued with power of ecclesiasticall gouernment, were not parishes properly but dioceses, and consequently that the angels of the churches or ancient bishops were not parishionall but diocesan bishops. The third, defending the superioritie of bishops aboue other ministers, and prouing that bishops alwayes had a prioritie not onely in order, but also in degree, and a maioritie of power both for ordination and iurisdiction. The fourth, maintayning that the episcopall function is of apostolicall and diuine institution.

Downame, George, d. 1634.

January 1611

[12], 238, [2], 148, 154, 168, [2] p.A defense of Downame's "A sermon defending the honourable funct...

Second part of a reply, answering a defence of a sermon preached at the consecration of the bishop of Bathe and Welles, by George Downame, Doctor of Divinitie.

Sheerwood, Rihcard,

[12], 293, [1]; [8], 164 p.A reply answering Downame's "A defence of the sermon preached at the cons...

An ansvvere to a sermon preached the 17 of April anno D. 1608, by George Downame Doctour of Divinitie and intituled, A sermon defendinge the honorable function of bishops wherein; all his reasons, brought to prove the honorable function of our L. Bishops, to be of divine institution; are answered and refuted.

January 1609

58, [2]; 166 p.Misattributed to John Rainolds. MS note by James Kennedy on copy in New College, Edin...

A sermon preached at Pauls Crosse, the 25. of Nouember. 1621 Vpon occasion of that false and scandalous report (lately printed) touching the supposed apostasie of the right Reuerend Father in God, Iohn King, late Lord Bishop of London. By Henry King, his eldest sonne. Whereunto is annexed the examination, and answere of Thomas Preston, p. taken before my Lords Grace of Canterbury, touching this scandall. Published by authority.

King, Henry, 1592-1669.
Preston, Thomas, 1563-1640.

January 1621

[8], 77, [11] p.A reply to a statement in: Broughton, Richard. English protestants plea, and petitio...

The diocesans tryall wherein all the sinnewes of Doctor Dovvnhams defence are brought into three heads, and orderly dissolved / by M. Paul Baynes ; published by Dr. William Amis ...

Baynes, Paul, d. 1617.
Ames, William, d. 1662.

[12], 89 p."The preface" signed: W. Ames.Date of publication from Wing.Reproduction of original in C...

A treatise of the authority of the church. The summe wherof was delivered in a sermon preached at Belfast, at the visitation of the diocese of Downe and Conner the tenth day of August 1636. By Henrie Leslie bishop of the diocese. Intended for the satisfaction of them who in those places oppose the orders of our church, and since published upon occasion of a libell sent abroad in writing, wherin this sermon, and all his proceedings are most falsely traduced. Together with an answer to certaine objections made against the orders of our church, especially kneeling at the communion.

Leslie, Henry, 1580-1661.

January 1637

[16], 190, [2] p.A sermon.With a final errata leaf.Reproduction of the original in Cambridge Univers...

A ioynt attestation, avowing that the discipline of the Church of England was not impeached by the Synode of Dort

Balcanquhall, Walter, 1586?-1645. aut
Carleton, George, 1559-1628. aut

January 1626

[4], 26, [2] p.Signed "Georgius Cicestriensis Episcopus. Iohannes Sarisburiensis Episcopus. Gualteru...

A defence of the churches and ministery of Englande.

Johnson, Francis, 1562-1618.
Jacob, Henry, 1563-1624.

January 1600

[28], 217, [3] p.Reprints and answers Jacob, Henry. "A defence of the churches and ministery of Eng...

Defence of the Reformed Catholicke of M. W. Perkins. Part 3

Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.

January 1609

[8], 184, 183-385, [1], 80, 91-108 p.A reply to: Bishop, William. The second part of The reformatio...

A reproofe of M. Doct. Abbots defence, of the Catholike deformed by M. W. Perkins Wherein his sundry abuses of Gods sacred word, and most manifold mangling, misaplying, and falsifying, the auncient Fathers sentences,be so plainely discouered, euen to the eye of euery indifferent reader, that whosoeuer hath any due care of his owne saluation, can neuer hereafter giue him more credit, in matter of faith and religion. The first part. Made by W.P.B. and Doct. in diuinty.

Bishop, William, 1554?-1624.

January 1608

287 p.W.P.B. = William Bishop.No more published.A reply to (STC 48): Abbot, Robert. A defence of th...

Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annext to the sermon, entituled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.

Love, Christopher, 1618-1651.

January 1647

[6], 33, [1], 33-44 p.A reply to: Dell, William. Right reformation."A short answer to an unlicensed...

A defence of the answer and arguments of the synod met at Boston in the year 1662 concerning the subject of Baptism and consociation of churches against the reply made thereto, by the Reverend Mr. John Davenport, pastor of the church at New-Haven, in his treatise entituled Another essay for investigation of the truth &c. : together with an answer to the apologetical preface set before that essay, by some of the elders who were members of the Synod above-mentioned.

Mather, Richard, 1596-1669.

January 1664

46, 102 p.Imperfect: p. 1-4 lacking."An answer" attributed to Jonathan Mitchel, A.M. of Cambridge , ...

A reply against M. Gilbert Brovvne priest Wherein is handled many of the greatest and weightiest pointes of controuersie betweene vs and the papists, and the truth of our doctrine clearely proued, and the falset of their religion and doctrine laide open, and most euidentlie conuicted and confuted, by the testimonies of the Scripture and auncient fathers; and also by some of their own popes, doctors, cardinals, and of their owne writters. Whereunto is anexed a seuerall treatise, concerning the masse and Antichrist. By M. Iohn Welsche, preacher of Christs Gospell at Aire.

Welch, John, 1568?-1622.
Browne, Gilbert, d. 1612.

January 1602

[36], 363, [1] p.At foot of title: Cum priuilegio regio.Prints for the first time Welch's original l...

A iust and temperate defence of the fiue books of ecclesiastical policie: written by M. Richard Hooker against an vncharitable letter of certain English Protestants (as they tearme themselues) crauing resolution, in some matters of doctrine, which seeme to ouerthrow the foundation of religion, and the Church amongst vs. Written by William Covel Doctor in Diuinitie, and published by authority. The contents whereof are in the page following.

Covell, William, d. 1614?

January 1603

[8], 154 [i.e. 152] p.A reply to: A Christian letter of certaine English protestants, unfained favou...

A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part

Ames, William, 1576-1633.

January 1633

[124], 156; 531, [13]; 64 p. : port.Attributed to William Ames in the advertisement to the reader.A ...

The diocesans tryall. Wherein all the sinnews of D. Dovvnames Defence are brought unto three heads, and orderly dissolved. By M. Paul Baynes.

Abstract

Extracted data

The diocesans tryall. Wherein all the sinnews of D. Dovvnames Defence are brought unto three heads, and orderly dissolved. By M. Paul Baynes.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items