A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply: in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

The Church of England defended against the calumnies and false reasonings, of the Church of Rome. : In answer to a late sophistical, and insolent, Popish book; entitled, England's conversion and reformation compar'd, &c. /

Trapp, Joseph, 1679-1747.

January 1727

Verso of t.p. (p. [2] at front) blank.Response to a work by Robert Manning. Cf. BMC.Mode of access: ...

The end of religious controversy [electronic resource] : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts; part I, on the rule of faith, or, the method of finding out the true religion; part II, on the characteristics of the true Church; part III, on rectifying mistakes concerning the Catholic Church /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1853

"Addressed to the Right Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to His Lordship's Pr...

The end of religious controversy : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants, and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts ... : addressed to the Rt. Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to his Lordship's Protestant catechism : to which is added the author's postscript /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1844

Includes bibliographical references.pt. 1. On the rule of faith, or, The method of finding out the t...

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.

January 1687

[3], 123, [1] p.Errata: prelim. p. [1].Includes bibliographical references.Advertisement: p. [1] at ...

An amicable accommodation of the difference between the representer and the answerer in return to his last reply against the papist protesting against Protestant popery.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[3], 40 p.Defence of Gother's "A papist misrepresented and represented" and his "Papists protesting ...

A papist not misrepresented by Protestants being a reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to (A papist misrepresented and represented.)

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[3], 71 p.Attributed to William Sherlock. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.).The Reflections upon the Ans...

Papists protesting against protestant popery. In answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not misrepresented by protestants. Being a vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented, and the Reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

Mode of access: Internet.With this is bound his Reflections upon the answer to the Papist mis-repres...

An answer to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery; being a vindication of Papists not misrepresented by Protestants: and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images, occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

By William Sherlock. cf.Halkett & Laing.Numbers 59-72 omitted in paging.Mode of access: Internet

A reply to the Answer of the Amicable accommodation being a fourth vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented : in which are more particularly laid open some of the principal methods by which the papists are misrepresented by Protestants in their books and sermons.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[3], 46 p.Written by John Gother. Cf. BM.Reproduction of original in Yale University Library

Papists protesting against Protestant-popery in answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not mis-represented by Protestants : being a vindication of The papist mis-represented and represented, and the reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[2], 38 p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

The difference of the case, between the separation of Protestants from the church of Rome, and the separation of dissenters from the Church of England.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.
Williams, John, 1636?-1709.

January 1683

By William Clagett. Also ascribed to John Williams. cf. Halkett & Laing.Mode of access: Internet

An answer to the representer's reflections upon the state and view of the controversy with a reply to the vindicator's full answer, shewing, that the vindicator has utterly ruined the new design of expounding and representing popery.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.
Clagett, Nicholas, 1654-1727.

January 1688

[11], 130 [i.e. 128] p.Attributed by Wing to William Clagett; identified by some sources as being wr...

The Hammersmith Protestant discussion : being an authenticated report of the controversial discussion between the Rev. John Cumming and Daniel French on the differences between Protestantism and popery; held at Hammersmith, during the months of April and May, 1839 /

Cumming, John, 1807-1881.
French, Daniel.

January 1860

Given verbatim from the reporter's notes. Statement of authenticity on t.p. verso signed: John Cummi...

The end of religious controversy, in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic divine; addresses to the Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to his lordship's Protestant's catechism,

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

pt.1. On the rule of faith; or, The method of finding out the true religion.--pt.2. On the character...

An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[2], 131 (i.e. 117) p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.Attri...

The Church of England defended against the calumnies and false reasonings, of the Church of Rome. : In answer to a late sophistical, and insolent, Popish book; entitled, England's conversion and reformation compar'd, &c. /

Trapp, Joseph, 1679-1747.

January 1727

Verso of t.p. (p. [2] at front) blank.Response to a work by Robert Manning. Cf. BMC.Mode of access: ...

The end of religious controversy [electronic resource] : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts; part I, on the rule of faith, or, the method of finding out the true religion; part II, on the characteristics of the true Church; part III, on rectifying mistakes concerning the Catholic Church /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1853

"Addressed to the Right Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to His Lordship's Pr...

The end of religious controversy : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants, and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts ... : addressed to the Rt. Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to his Lordship's Protestant catechism : to which is added the author's postscript /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1844

Includes bibliographical references.pt. 1. On the rule of faith, or, The method of finding out the t...

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.

January 1687

[3], 123, [1] p.Errata: prelim. p. [1].Includes bibliographical references.Advertisement: p. [1] at ...

An amicable accommodation of the difference between the representer and the answerer in return to his last reply against the papist protesting against Protestant popery.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[3], 40 p.Defence of Gother's "A papist misrepresented and represented" and his "Papists protesting ...

A papist not misrepresented by Protestants being a reply to the Reflections upon the Answer to (A papist misrepresented and represented.)

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[3], 71 p.Attributed to William Sherlock. Cf. Halkett & Laing (2nd ed.).The Reflections upon the Ans...

Papists protesting against protestant popery. In answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not misrepresented by protestants. Being a vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented, and the Reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

Mode of access: Internet.With this is bound his Reflections upon the answer to the Papist mis-repres...

An answer to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery; being a vindication of Papists not misrepresented by Protestants: and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images, occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

By William Sherlock. cf.Halkett & Laing.Numbers 59-72 omitted in paging.Mode of access: Internet

A reply to the Answer of the Amicable accommodation being a fourth vindication of the Papist misrepresented and represented : in which are more particularly laid open some of the principal methods by which the papists are misrepresented by Protestants in their books and sermons.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[3], 46 p.Written by John Gother. Cf. BM.Reproduction of original in Yale University Library

Papists protesting against Protestant-popery in answer to a discourse entituled, A papist not mis-represented by Protestants : being a vindication of The papist mis-represented and represented, and the reflections upon the answer.

Gother, John, d. 1704.

January 1686

[2], 38 p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

The difference of the case, between the separation of Protestants from the church of Rome, and the separation of dissenters from the Church of England.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.
Williams, John, 1636?-1709.

January 1683

By William Clagett. Also ascribed to John Williams. cf. Halkett & Laing.Mode of access: Internet

An answer to the representer's reflections upon the state and view of the controversy with a reply to the vindicator's full answer, shewing, that the vindicator has utterly ruined the new design of expounding and representing popery.

Clagett, William, 1646-1688.
Clagett, Nicholas, 1654-1727.

January 1688

[11], 130 [i.e. 128] p.Attributed by Wing to William Clagett; identified by some sources as being wr...

The Hammersmith Protestant discussion : being an authenticated report of the controversial discussion between the Rev. John Cumming and Daniel French on the differences between Protestantism and popery; held at Hammersmith, during the months of April and May, 1839 /

Cumming, John, 1807-1881.
French, Daniel.

January 1860

Given verbatim from the reporter's notes. Statement of authenticity on t.p. verso signed: John Cummi...

The end of religious controversy, in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic divine; addresses to the Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to his lordship's Protestant's catechism,

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

pt.1. On the rule of faith; or, The method of finding out the true religion.--pt.2. On the character...

An ansvver to a discourse intituled, Papists protesting against Protestant-popery being a vindication of papists not misrepresented by Protestants : and containing a particular examination of Monsieur de Meaux, late Bishop of Condom, his Exposition of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, in the articles of invocation of saints, and the worship of images occasioned by that discourse.

Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707.

January 1686

[2], 131 (i.e. 117) p.Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.Attri...

The Church of England defended against the calumnies and false reasonings, of the Church of Rome. : In answer to a late sophistical, and insolent, Popish book; entitled, England's conversion and reformation compar'd, &c. /

Trapp, Joseph, 1679-1747.

January 1727

Verso of t.p. (p. [2] at front) blank.Response to a work by Robert Manning. Cf. BMC.Mode of access: ...

The end of religious controversy [electronic resource] : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts; part I, on the rule of faith, or, the method of finding out the true religion; part II, on the characteristics of the true Church; part III, on rectifying mistakes concerning the Catholic Church /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1853

"Addressed to the Right Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to His Lordship's Pr...

The end of religious controversy : in a friendly correspondence between a religious society of Protestants, and a Roman Catholic divine, in three parts ... : addressed to the Rt. Rev. Dr. Burgess, Lord Bishop of St. David's, in answer to his Lordship's Protestant catechism : to which is added the author's postscript /

Milner, John, 1752-1826.

January 1844

Includes bibliographical references.pt. 1. On the rule of faith, or, The method of finding out the t...

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply: in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Abstract

Extracted data

A view of the whole controversy between the representer and the answerer, with an answer to the representer's last reply: in which are laid open some of the methods by which Protestants are misrepresented by papists.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items