Three different electrofishing systems were compared to determine their relative efficiency with respect to species and numbers of fish collected. These results indicated that modifications or changes in electrofishing gear during a monitoring program should not be made unless it can be demonstrated that collecting efficiency is not altered
The knowledge of capture efficiency and side effects of electrofishing is essential for research and...
The efficiency of three PAS electrofishing techniques (direct electrofishing, throwing of anode and ...
1. The upper Illinois River is warmer than the lower River, as a result of warm municipal and indust...
Three different electrofishing systems were compared to determine their relative efficiency with res...
We evaluated the outputs from eight Smith-Root electrofishers (two factory-rigged model-5.0 GPP boat...
I conducted a paired-gear comparison study in large standing warmwater reservoirs in Arizona during ...
Gear comparison studies are useful to fisheries managers because many aquatic systems require multip...
The variability in size structure and relative abundance (CPUE; number of fish 200mm total length, L...
The project documented the effectiveness of commercially harvesting invasive Ictaurids in the James ...
Electrofishing is one of the most widely used methods to sample fishes in freshwater ecosystems. Th...
Report issued on: September 1987INHS Technical Report prepared for unspecified recipien
Global aquatic ecosystems are negatively affected by a variety of mechanisms including habitat destr...
Abstract.—Despite increasing popularity of blue catfi sh Ictalurus furcatus with anglers, effective ...
The type of electrofishing gear influences capture efficiencies and abundance estimates of stream fi...
The San Francisco Estuary is an incredibly diverse ecosystem with a mosaic of aquatic habitats inhab...
The knowledge of capture efficiency and side effects of electrofishing is essential for research and...
The efficiency of three PAS electrofishing techniques (direct electrofishing, throwing of anode and ...
1. The upper Illinois River is warmer than the lower River, as a result of warm municipal and indust...
Three different electrofishing systems were compared to determine their relative efficiency with res...
We evaluated the outputs from eight Smith-Root electrofishers (two factory-rigged model-5.0 GPP boat...
I conducted a paired-gear comparison study in large standing warmwater reservoirs in Arizona during ...
Gear comparison studies are useful to fisheries managers because many aquatic systems require multip...
The variability in size structure and relative abundance (CPUE; number of fish 200mm total length, L...
The project documented the effectiveness of commercially harvesting invasive Ictaurids in the James ...
Electrofishing is one of the most widely used methods to sample fishes in freshwater ecosystems. Th...
Report issued on: September 1987INHS Technical Report prepared for unspecified recipien
Global aquatic ecosystems are negatively affected by a variety of mechanisms including habitat destr...
Abstract.—Despite increasing popularity of blue catfi sh Ictalurus furcatus with anglers, effective ...
The type of electrofishing gear influences capture efficiencies and abundance estimates of stream fi...
The San Francisco Estuary is an incredibly diverse ecosystem with a mosaic of aquatic habitats inhab...
The knowledge of capture efficiency and side effects of electrofishing is essential for research and...
The efficiency of three PAS electrofishing techniques (direct electrofishing, throwing of anode and ...
1. The upper Illinois River is warmer than the lower River, as a result of warm municipal and indust...