Add to ORKGThe purpose of this paper is to describe and explain the many different theories of constitutional interpretation. I have placed all theories discussed in one of two categories: interpretist or noninterpretivist. This paper also attempts to analyze the way in which these theories of constitutional interpretation are implemented by the United States Supreme Court Justices who advocate them
Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular metho...
When do, and when should, actors other than judges interpret the Constitution? Over time, this quest...
This Article attempts to reset the relationship between theories of constitutional authority and met...
Constitutional Theory is at the center of legal and political debates in the United States. In recen...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
Interpretation is the means by which the Constitution and its clauses are brought to bear on actual ...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
The current debate over constitutional interpretation often proceeds on the assumption that the Cons...
This Article attempts to reset the relationship between theories of constitutional authority and met...
The Constitution inevitably must be interpreted. There are countless issues — such as whether the pr...
Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular metho...
When do, and when should, actors other than judges interpret the Constitution? Over time, this quest...
This Article attempts to reset the relationship between theories of constitutional authority and met...
Constitutional Theory is at the center of legal and political debates in the United States. In recen...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
Rejecting judicial supremacy in constitutional interpretation, this paper argues that understanding ...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
The United States Supreme Court is increasingly forsaking its role as legal interpreter for the role...
Interpretation is the means by which the Constitution and its clauses are brought to bear on actual ...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
This Article provides a counterbalance to current trends in the constitutional interpretation debate...
The current debate over constitutional interpretation often proceeds on the assumption that the Cons...
This Article attempts to reset the relationship between theories of constitutional authority and met...
The Constitution inevitably must be interpreted. There are countless issues — such as whether the pr...
Some people believe that the very idea of interpretation requires judges to adopt a particular metho...
When do, and when should, actors other than judges interpret the Constitution? Over time, this quest...
This Article attempts to reset the relationship between theories of constitutional authority and met...