Add to ORKGThis commentary examines whether R2P is a fully-fledged norm. As a normative aspiration R2P is almost universally accepted. However as a standard of behaviour that states implement as a matter of course R2P is far from fully-fledged. By examining state responses to refugee crises in Syria it is argued that powerful states are failing in their special responsibility to protect. (author's abstract
The emergence of the concept of R2P has been characterized as the most dramatic and rapid normative ...
What is the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine? Obviously on one level, it reflects what was a...
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norm is a rule that was propounded based on established principl...
This commentary examines whether R2P is a fully-fledged norm. As a normative aspiration R2P is almos...
This commentary examines whether R2P is a fully-fledged norm. As a normative aspiration R2P is almos...
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether, after 16 years or more of its development, R2P has ...
International relations scholars generally argue that norm-building requires a number of successful ...
This book explains why there is a pronounced disjuncture between R2P's habitual invocation and its a...
Abstract In 2005 the United Nations (UN) unanimously agreed setting up a framework for the respons...
This essay looks at the concept of The Responsibility to Protect as a principle and examines under w...
The most dramatic normative development of our time�comparable to the Nuremberg trials and the 1948 ...
Some are arguing that the the Responsibility to Protect, an international norm that aims to prevent ...
The Responsibility to Protect doctrine (R2P) is not a new practice of international customary law, I...
This blog post is based on broader PhD research, which examined the UK’s commitment to, and understa...
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine is based on the assumption that the state is to remain ...
The emergence of the concept of R2P has been characterized as the most dramatic and rapid normative ...
What is the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine? Obviously on one level, it reflects what was a...
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norm is a rule that was propounded based on established principl...
This commentary examines whether R2P is a fully-fledged norm. As a normative aspiration R2P is almos...
This commentary examines whether R2P is a fully-fledged norm. As a normative aspiration R2P is almos...
The purpose of this paper is to examine whether, after 16 years or more of its development, R2P has ...
International relations scholars generally argue that norm-building requires a number of successful ...
This book explains why there is a pronounced disjuncture between R2P's habitual invocation and its a...
Abstract In 2005 the United Nations (UN) unanimously agreed setting up a framework for the respons...
This essay looks at the concept of The Responsibility to Protect as a principle and examines under w...
The most dramatic normative development of our time�comparable to the Nuremberg trials and the 1948 ...
Some are arguing that the the Responsibility to Protect, an international norm that aims to prevent ...
The Responsibility to Protect doctrine (R2P) is not a new practice of international customary law, I...
This blog post is based on broader PhD research, which examined the UK’s commitment to, and understa...
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine is based on the assumption that the state is to remain ...
The emergence of the concept of R2P has been characterized as the most dramatic and rapid normative ...
What is the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine? Obviously on one level, it reflects what was a...
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norm is a rule that was propounded based on established principl...