Add to ORKGIt is not a paradox. For it to be a paradox, the following would have to be true: that when one is free to do one thing, or not to do it, one is also free to threaten to do it and sell that for money. But threat and sale are not even lesser included acts within doing and not doing; they are quite different from doing or not doing
For generations, criminal law theorists, moral and political philosophers, and economists have strug...
Yerokhin, O. (2011). The social cost of blackmail. Review of Law and Economics, 7 (1), 337-351. The ...
First, Lee Bollinger (and others) seem to feel that the misappropriation urge makes sense when see...
Blackmail commentary continues to multiply. The purpose of this paper is to show what we agree on. I...
An adequate theoretical justification for the prohibition of blackmail should explain both of its pa...
Blackmail law can impact on the belief structures (moralisms) and behaviors of both the potential cr...
Despite the fact that blackmail constitutes a voluntary transaction between two parties, it is deeme...
Disclosure of true but reputation-damaging information is generally legal. But threats to disclose t...
The ongoing debate about the rationale for punishing blackmail assumes that there is something odd a...
In an article recently published in the Yale Law Journal, Larissa Katz defends a heterodox principle...
By the usual principles of claim-staking, casually viewed, the person who describes a new form of i/...
In many states, past property theft is a volatile political issue that threatens to destabilize nasc...
Blackmail commentary continues to proliferate. One purpose of this paper is to show what we agree on...
Despite the fact that blackmail constitutes a voluntary transaction between two parties, it is deeme...
Blackmail - the wrongful conditional threat to do what would be permissible - presents one of the gr...
For generations, criminal law theorists, moral and political philosophers, and economists have strug...
Yerokhin, O. (2011). The social cost of blackmail. Review of Law and Economics, 7 (1), 337-351. The ...
First, Lee Bollinger (and others) seem to feel that the misappropriation urge makes sense when see...
Blackmail commentary continues to multiply. The purpose of this paper is to show what we agree on. I...
An adequate theoretical justification for the prohibition of blackmail should explain both of its pa...
Blackmail law can impact on the belief structures (moralisms) and behaviors of both the potential cr...
Despite the fact that blackmail constitutes a voluntary transaction between two parties, it is deeme...
Disclosure of true but reputation-damaging information is generally legal. But threats to disclose t...
The ongoing debate about the rationale for punishing blackmail assumes that there is something odd a...
In an article recently published in the Yale Law Journal, Larissa Katz defends a heterodox principle...
By the usual principles of claim-staking, casually viewed, the person who describes a new form of i/...
In many states, past property theft is a volatile political issue that threatens to destabilize nasc...
Blackmail commentary continues to proliferate. One purpose of this paper is to show what we agree on...
Despite the fact that blackmail constitutes a voluntary transaction between two parties, it is deeme...
Blackmail - the wrongful conditional threat to do what would be permissible - presents one of the gr...
For generations, criminal law theorists, moral and political philosophers, and economists have strug...
Yerokhin, O. (2011). The social cost of blackmail. Review of Law and Economics, 7 (1), 337-351. The ...
First, Lee Bollinger (and others) seem to feel that the misappropriation urge makes sense when see...