The present study investigates whether directing five- to six-year-old children’s attention to hypothetical resource recipients that included familiar and non-familiar people would affect their favoritism toward a familiar person, as reflected in how they allocated resources. In Experiment 1, we instructed participants to give one of several stickers to another person or keep all the stickers for themselves. Under the control conditions, participants more frequently gave stickers to friends than to non-friends. However, when asked about others’ emotions, they distributed stickers equally among friends and non-friends. Therefore, focusing on others’ thoughts reduced participants’ favoritism toward friends. Experiment 2 tested whether focusin...
Abstract: Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is kno...
Two-year-old children’s reasoning about the relation between their own and others’ preferences was i...
Children distribute resources to recipients differentially regarding various factors such as ‘need’ ...
The present study investigates whether directing five- to six-year-old children’s attention to hypot...
Children express preferences for a wide range of options, such as objects, and frequently observe th...
Children interact with peers in their daily lives and sometimes help, share, or otherwise do somethi...
An experimental vignette study was conducted among children (8-13years) to examine whether inducing ...
This study presents evidence from a field experiment on the prevalence of favoritism at school among...
This experiment addressed the question of whether children\u27\u27s own emotional states influence t...
An experimental vignette study was conducted among children (8-13years) to examine whether inducing ...
Given its importance for the emergence of intergroup conflict, the development of other-regarding pr...
Relative outcomes in social commerce with peers are potent determinants of cognitions and behavior i...
Our purpose was to determine the influence of positive emotional states on young children\u27s respo...
Includes bibliographical references.The effects of friendship on reward allocation behavior in six- ...
Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is known about th...
Abstract: Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is kno...
Two-year-old children’s reasoning about the relation between their own and others’ preferences was i...
Children distribute resources to recipients differentially regarding various factors such as ‘need’ ...
The present study investigates whether directing five- to six-year-old children’s attention to hypot...
Children express preferences for a wide range of options, such as objects, and frequently observe th...
Children interact with peers in their daily lives and sometimes help, share, or otherwise do somethi...
An experimental vignette study was conducted among children (8-13years) to examine whether inducing ...
This study presents evidence from a field experiment on the prevalence of favoritism at school among...
This experiment addressed the question of whether children\u27\u27s own emotional states influence t...
An experimental vignette study was conducted among children (8-13years) to examine whether inducing ...
Given its importance for the emergence of intergroup conflict, the development of other-regarding pr...
Relative outcomes in social commerce with peers are potent determinants of cognitions and behavior i...
Our purpose was to determine the influence of positive emotional states on young children\u27s respo...
Includes bibliographical references.The effects of friendship on reward allocation behavior in six- ...
Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is known about th...
Abstract: Young children spontaneously share resources with anonymous recipients, but little is kno...
Two-year-old children’s reasoning about the relation between their own and others’ preferences was i...
Children distribute resources to recipients differentially regarding various factors such as ‘need’ ...