Observational Bias and Young Massive Cluster Characterisation II. Can Gaia accurately observe young clusters and associations?

Observations of clusters suffer from issues such as completeness, projection effects, resolving individual stars and extinction. As such, how accurate are measurements and conclusions are likely to be? Here, we take cluster simulations (Westerlund2- and Orion- type), synthetically observe them to obtain luminosities, accounting for extinction and the inherent limits of Gaia, then place them within the real Gaia DR3 catalogue. We then attempt to rediscover the clusters at distances of between 500pc and 4300pc. We show the spatial and kinematic criteria which are best able to pick out the simulated clusters, maximising completeness and minimising contamination. We then compare the properties of the 'observed' clusters with the original simulations. We looked at the degree of clustering, the identification of clusters and subclusters within the datasets, and whether the clusters are expanding or contracting. Even with a high level of incompleteness (e.g. $