The interrogative flip with illocutionary evidentials

This paper develops an account of the Cuzco Quechua reportativeevidential. It is proposed that it contributes a preparatory condition in all its useswhich states that the evidence holder has reportative evidence that supports thespeaker raising the issue denoted by the sentence it occurs in. In declarativesentences, this results in the speech act of presenting the proposition expressedwithout expressing the speaker’s belief that it is true. In interrogatives, there aretwo readings. On the interrogative flip reading, the evidence holder is the addressee and the resulting speech act is a question supported by the speaker’s assumption that the addressee has reportative evidence for one of the answers. On the second reading, the evidence holder is the speaker, and the resulting speech act is one of asking the question on behalf of someone else. The account differs from previous accounts of the flipped reading of evidentials in questions which make them part of the answers. It is argued that analyzing the reportative’s contribution as a preparatory condition better captures the insight that the speaker chooses the evidential based on what they know about the addressee’s likely type of evidence at the time of speaking. The paper moreover argues that preparatory conditions cannot be analyzed as presuppositions in the common ground and should instead be understood as propositions the speaker takes for granted, but which may be new information to the addressee