Rows present different occlusion conditions with respect to the neighbor in question. Columns contrast the various models in how they respond to these conditions. See also Fig 4.</p
<p>Forest plot of dominant model for overall comparison by ethnicities (6A/6A+6A/5A vs. 5A/5A).</p
The upper row shows the comparisons for different chairs. The lower row shows the comparisons for th...
The difference in trophic level decomposition (sensu Lindeman) between the CAB and RAB models.</p
Overview of the single-species models with model dimensions and constraints used for the community m...
Actual category is indicated by the row, predicted category by the column. The upper left and lower ...
<p>(A) the outside view of our resulting mesh; (B) the outside view of FSC mesh; (C) the cutaway vie...
<p>Model comparison for models with (Full) and without (Reduced) epistasis terms included.</p
<p><b>A</b>) The complex model involves many inter-dependent state variables (black boxes), depicted...
Model A includes models differing in the center distance. Model B includes models differing in the o...
Summary of model selection results for two-species occupancy models that tested the hypothesis that ...
<p>Comparison of efficiency in available model reduction methodologies for systems biology models.</...
<p>The second column is the number of ASEs used in model inference. The third and fourth columns lis...
<p>Comparison of structural alternative model and path magnitudes between four groups.</p
<p>Forest plot of dominant model for overall comparison by cancer types (6A/6A+6A/5A vs. 5A/5A).</p
<p>Comparison of tree aboveground biomass models, based on destructive sampling data of the present ...
<p>Forest plot of dominant model for overall comparison by ethnicities (6A/6A+6A/5A vs. 5A/5A).</p
The upper row shows the comparisons for different chairs. The lower row shows the comparisons for th...
The difference in trophic level decomposition (sensu Lindeman) between the CAB and RAB models.</p
Overview of the single-species models with model dimensions and constraints used for the community m...
Actual category is indicated by the row, predicted category by the column. The upper left and lower ...
<p>(A) the outside view of our resulting mesh; (B) the outside view of FSC mesh; (C) the cutaway vie...
<p>Model comparison for models with (Full) and without (Reduced) epistasis terms included.</p
<p><b>A</b>) The complex model involves many inter-dependent state variables (black boxes), depicted...
Model A includes models differing in the center distance. Model B includes models differing in the o...
Summary of model selection results for two-species occupancy models that tested the hypothesis that ...
<p>Comparison of efficiency in available model reduction methodologies for systems biology models.</...
<p>The second column is the number of ASEs used in model inference. The third and fourth columns lis...
<p>Comparison of structural alternative model and path magnitudes between four groups.</p
<p>Forest plot of dominant model for overall comparison by cancer types (6A/6A+6A/5A vs. 5A/5A).</p
<p>Comparison of tree aboveground biomass models, based on destructive sampling data of the present ...
<p>Forest plot of dominant model for overall comparison by ethnicities (6A/6A+6A/5A vs. 5A/5A).</p
The upper row shows the comparisons for different chairs. The lower row shows the comparisons for th...
The difference in trophic level decomposition (sensu Lindeman) between the CAB and RAB models.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG