Stewart Cohen offers a critique of much contemporary epistemology. Epistemologies use the term ‘epistemic’ in order to specify the issues they investigate and about which they disagree. Cohen sees widespread confusion about these issues. The problem, he argues, is that ‘epistemic’ is functioning as an inadequately defined technical term. I will argue, rather, that the troubles come more from non-technical vocabulary, in particular with ‘justification’ and ‘ought’, and generally from the difficulty of explaining normativity. Overall, the message of this paper is that normativity is what’s hard to understand, not the term ‘epistemic.’</p
Davidson's philosophy can, in an important sense, be characterised as a form of normativism, the vie...
Although only a recently introduced term of art, philosophical enquiry under the rubric of ‘normativ...
There are two issues I want to very briefly raise in response to Robin McKenna’s paper, “Epistemic C...
Stewart Cohen offers a critique of much contemporary epistemology. Epistemologies use the term ‘epis...
Stewart Cohen argues that much contemporary epistemological theorizing is hampered by the fact that ...
There are a number of debates that are relevant to questions concerning objectivity in science. One ...
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical n...
The standard objection against naturalised epistemology is that it cannot account for normativity in...
By talking of ‘knowledge’, rather than of ‘knowledges ’ or ‘knowings’, we take, albeit implicitly, a...
the sheer scope of what the book hopes to accomplish that makes the comparison apt. In the book, Gib...
This article offers an introduction to the recent debate on the nature of epistemic normativity and ...
When embarking on a journey towards the constitution of epistemological semanticsone needs to descri...
Many naturalistically-minded philosophers want to accomplish a nat-uralistic reduction of normative ...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
An important issue in epistemology concerns the source of epistemic normativity. Epistemic consequen...
Davidson's philosophy can, in an important sense, be characterised as a form of normativism, the vie...
Although only a recently introduced term of art, philosophical enquiry under the rubric of ‘normativ...
There are two issues I want to very briefly raise in response to Robin McKenna’s paper, “Epistemic C...
Stewart Cohen offers a critique of much contemporary epistemology. Epistemologies use the term ‘epis...
Stewart Cohen argues that much contemporary epistemological theorizing is hampered by the fact that ...
There are a number of debates that are relevant to questions concerning objectivity in science. One ...
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical n...
The standard objection against naturalised epistemology is that it cannot account for normativity in...
By talking of ‘knowledge’, rather than of ‘knowledges ’ or ‘knowings’, we take, albeit implicitly, a...
the sheer scope of what the book hopes to accomplish that makes the comparison apt. In the book, Gib...
This article offers an introduction to the recent debate on the nature of epistemic normativity and ...
When embarking on a journey towards the constitution of epistemological semanticsone needs to descri...
Many naturalistically-minded philosophers want to accomplish a nat-uralistic reduction of normative ...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
An important issue in epistemology concerns the source of epistemic normativity. Epistemic consequen...
Davidson's philosophy can, in an important sense, be characterised as a form of normativism, the vie...
Although only a recently introduced term of art, philosophical enquiry under the rubric of ‘normativ...
There are two issues I want to very briefly raise in response to Robin McKenna’s paper, “Epistemic C...