This Note analyzes sacred site protection under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) and argues that the Ninth Circuit’s upcoming en banc review of Apache Stronghold is a critical moment for many Indigenous faiths. Against the backdrop of a religious freedom resurgence for other faiths over the past decade, the practitioners in Apache Stronghold face the irreparable loss of identity and culture
Over the past 25 years, religious institutions have greatly increased their claims of violation of r...
Dissertation supervisor: Dr. Mark M. Carroll.Includes vita.Combining historical and policy analysis,...
In 1988 the United States Supreme Court declared constitutional the federal government’s ...
Protection of sacred sites is very important to Native American religious practitioners because it...
Federal land management agencies historically have disregarded American Indian cries for protection ...
S acred mountains, of whatever culture, become merchandise in the dark age that is enveloping the pl...
The federal public lands contain places with both religious and secular value for American people. A...
Freedom of religion has been a key right since the founding of our nation. Over time, the Congress a...
Although the Free Exercise Clause prohibits governmental interference with religion, American Indian...
Clinton\u27s sacred site executive order applies to all federal lands and to all recognized Indi...
From North Dakota’s Standing Rock encampments to Arizona’s San Francisco Peaks, Native Americans hav...
The key to understanding current U. S. caselaw concerning the protection of Native American sacred s...
Employment Division v. Smith was a watershed moment in First Amendment law, with the Supreme Court h...
This paper examines the challenge of protecting American Indian sacred sites located on federal publ...
For centuries, American Indians have regarded specific lands as essential to their livelihood, gover...
Over the past 25 years, religious institutions have greatly increased their claims of violation of r...
Dissertation supervisor: Dr. Mark M. Carroll.Includes vita.Combining historical and policy analysis,...
In 1988 the United States Supreme Court declared constitutional the federal government’s ...
Protection of sacred sites is very important to Native American religious practitioners because it...
Federal land management agencies historically have disregarded American Indian cries for protection ...
S acred mountains, of whatever culture, become merchandise in the dark age that is enveloping the pl...
The federal public lands contain places with both religious and secular value for American people. A...
Freedom of religion has been a key right since the founding of our nation. Over time, the Congress a...
Although the Free Exercise Clause prohibits governmental interference with religion, American Indian...
Clinton\u27s sacred site executive order applies to all federal lands and to all recognized Indi...
From North Dakota’s Standing Rock encampments to Arizona’s San Francisco Peaks, Native Americans hav...
The key to understanding current U. S. caselaw concerning the protection of Native American sacred s...
Employment Division v. Smith was a watershed moment in First Amendment law, with the Supreme Court h...
This paper examines the challenge of protecting American Indian sacred sites located on federal publ...
For centuries, American Indians have regarded specific lands as essential to their livelihood, gover...
Over the past 25 years, religious institutions have greatly increased their claims of violation of r...
Dissertation supervisor: Dr. Mark M. Carroll.Includes vita.Combining historical and policy analysis,...
In 1988 the United States Supreme Court declared constitutional the federal government’s ...