The presented work includes a comparison of three tools for preparing and conducting automated tests - JUnit5, TestNG and Spock. The study, on the basis of which the comparative analysis was carried out, consisted in performing three types of experiments, i.e. performance tests based on five test scenarios, functional tests checking the capabilities of each tool, and tests of popularity and support in the modern context. The performance experiment consisted in configuring the test environment, preparing tests based on scenarios, performing them multiple times, and then verifying and analysing the obtained time results. The comparison of tools capabilities was based on the preparation of a set of key functionalities of the software used to d...
The article is about the benefits of using the Test-Driven Development methodology. Tests were carri...
This article presents a comparative analysis of selected tools dedicated to project management: Asan...
Comparative analysis tools for user interfaces prototyping was conducted using a mixed method consis...
The article presents a comparative analysis of tools supporting the production of automated tests fo...
The paper concerns a comparison of selected tools for conducting automated unit tests of web applica...
The paper presents a comparative analysis of selected tools to perform unit tests. The analysis cove...
The subject of this article is a comparison of selected tools for the implementation of software tes...
The aim of the article is to compare the tools for automating user interface tests on the example of...
Automation tests are used for verification of functionality of developing applications. The performa...
This paper conducts a performance analysis of three libraries: XUnit, NUnit, MSTest, aiming to compa...
The article presents the analysis of the use of A/B tests, KLM method, Nielsen heuristics and user r...
Automated tests are designed to verify the functionality of the system at the level of the end-user ...
Projekt został zrealizowany w ramach współpracy Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego i R&D Nokia Network's. ...
Comparative analysis tools for prototyping of user interfaces was carried out using a multi-criteria...
The article is about the benefits of using the Test-Driven Development methodology. Tests were carri...
This article presents a comparative analysis of selected tools dedicated to project management: Asan...
Comparative analysis tools for user interfaces prototyping was conducted using a mixed method consis...
The article presents a comparative analysis of tools supporting the production of automated tests fo...
The paper concerns a comparison of selected tools for conducting automated unit tests of web applica...
The paper presents a comparative analysis of selected tools to perform unit tests. The analysis cove...
The subject of this article is a comparison of selected tools for the implementation of software tes...
The aim of the article is to compare the tools for automating user interface tests on the example of...
Automation tests are used for verification of functionality of developing applications. The performa...
This paper conducts a performance analysis of three libraries: XUnit, NUnit, MSTest, aiming to compa...
The article presents the analysis of the use of A/B tests, KLM method, Nielsen heuristics and user r...
Automated tests are designed to verify the functionality of the system at the level of the end-user ...
Projekt został zrealizowany w ramach współpracy Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego i R&D Nokia Network's. ...
Comparative analysis tools for prototyping of user interfaces was carried out using a multi-criteria...
The article is about the benefits of using the Test-Driven Development methodology. Tests were carri...
This article presents a comparative analysis of selected tools dedicated to project management: Asan...
Comparative analysis tools for user interfaces prototyping was conducted using a mixed method consis...