Add to ORKGThe concept of epistemic injustice illuminates how children's and parents' embodied, emotional and experiential knowledge has been more valid than medical and nursing theories about children's best interests when they are in hospital and have surgery
Part I of this Comment traces the development of ethical and legal guidelines for current informed c...
The concept of epistemic (specifically testimonial) injustice is the latest philosophical tool with ...
This discussion paper considers how seldom recognised theories influence clinical ethics committees....
Mainstream law and ethics literature on consent to children’s surgery contrasts with moral experienc...
Epistemic injustice occurs whenever someone is regarded as lacking in fully fledged capacities as a ...
This paper discusses contradictions within concepts of children's competence or capacity to consent...
BACKGROUND: The law and literature about children’s consent generally assume that patients aged unde...
Traditionally, children have been identified as incompetent to consent to health treatment. In the ...
Background: The law and literature about children’s consent generally assume that patients aged unde...
This article traces how the rise of respect for children’s consent during the 1980s has fallen durin...
The thesis includes: reviews of ethics, law, philosophy, psychology and social science literature; t...
While there is a steadily growing literature on epistemic injustice in healthcare, there are few dis...
Bioethics guidelines vary in their response to children as research subjects. Children have been ig...
The history of pediatric medical research has been characterized as a history of child abuse. Usuall...
In this paper, we argue that certain theoretical conceptions of health, particularly those described...
Part I of this Comment traces the development of ethical and legal guidelines for current informed c...
The concept of epistemic (specifically testimonial) injustice is the latest philosophical tool with ...
This discussion paper considers how seldom recognised theories influence clinical ethics committees....
Mainstream law and ethics literature on consent to children’s surgery contrasts with moral experienc...
Epistemic injustice occurs whenever someone is regarded as lacking in fully fledged capacities as a ...
This paper discusses contradictions within concepts of children's competence or capacity to consent...
BACKGROUND: The law and literature about children’s consent generally assume that patients aged unde...
Traditionally, children have been identified as incompetent to consent to health treatment. In the ...
Background: The law and literature about children’s consent generally assume that patients aged unde...
This article traces how the rise of respect for children’s consent during the 1980s has fallen durin...
The thesis includes: reviews of ethics, law, philosophy, psychology and social science literature; t...
While there is a steadily growing literature on epistemic injustice in healthcare, there are few dis...
Bioethics guidelines vary in their response to children as research subjects. Children have been ig...
The history of pediatric medical research has been characterized as a history of child abuse. Usuall...
In this paper, we argue that certain theoretical conceptions of health, particularly those described...
Part I of this Comment traces the development of ethical and legal guidelines for current informed c...
The concept of epistemic (specifically testimonial) injustice is the latest philosophical tool with ...
This discussion paper considers how seldom recognised theories influence clinical ethics committees....