An examination of the differences between the ideological positions of leaders and other members in the U.S. House of Representatives (1965-96) demonstrates that Republican leaders tend to be significantly to the right of the median Republican member and Democratic leaders tend to be significantly to the left of the median Democratic member. Furthermore, leaders from both parties tend to be ideologically located near the mode of their party's ideological distribution. These empirical results have implications for issues such as party polarization, conditional party government, and the possibility of separating out party and ideology
Recent research on congressional elections suggests that voters are more likely to split their votes...
We test two explanations of the legislative process for their ability to account for the ideological...
This article investigates the ways in which parties stake out left–right positions that deviate from...
An examination of the differences between the ideological positions of leaders and other members in ...
Influential theories of legislative organization predict that congressional leaders should be select...
Grofman et al. (forthcoming) find that party leaders in the U. S. House of Representatives tend to b...
This paper will explore further the process of selection of majority party leaders in the United Sta...
We argue that the leadership selection system, which now gives significant weight to fundraising, he...
A number of recent studies address the phenomenon of “ideological realignment ” in the American poli...
This paper examines how the incumbency advantage is related to ideological voting or legislative shi...
Elected officials in the United States appear to represent relatively extreme support coalitions rat...
This paper examines the impact of Democrats' ideological diversity on the strength of legislative le...
Reelection and self-interest are recurring themes in the study of our congressional leaders. To date...
Party leaders and committee chairs are rarely studied side by side. This study takes a step toward r...
This thesis aims to contribute to the current academic debate on contemporary polarization in the U....
Recent research on congressional elections suggests that voters are more likely to split their votes...
We test two explanations of the legislative process for their ability to account for the ideological...
This article investigates the ways in which parties stake out left–right positions that deviate from...
An examination of the differences between the ideological positions of leaders and other members in ...
Influential theories of legislative organization predict that congressional leaders should be select...
Grofman et al. (forthcoming) find that party leaders in the U. S. House of Representatives tend to b...
This paper will explore further the process of selection of majority party leaders in the United Sta...
We argue that the leadership selection system, which now gives significant weight to fundraising, he...
A number of recent studies address the phenomenon of “ideological realignment ” in the American poli...
This paper examines how the incumbency advantage is related to ideological voting or legislative shi...
Elected officials in the United States appear to represent relatively extreme support coalitions rat...
This paper examines the impact of Democrats' ideological diversity on the strength of legislative le...
Reelection and self-interest are recurring themes in the study of our congressional leaders. To date...
Party leaders and committee chairs are rarely studied side by side. This study takes a step toward r...
This thesis aims to contribute to the current academic debate on contemporary polarization in the U....
Recent research on congressional elections suggests that voters are more likely to split their votes...
We test two explanations of the legislative process for their ability to account for the ideological...
This article investigates the ways in which parties stake out left–right positions that deviate from...