PRISMA checklist.

BackgroundEmerging evidence has demonstrated that PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) play important roles in various physiological processes and contribute to cancer progression. Moreover, piRNAs and PIWI protein levels are associated with the prognosis and chemoresistance of various cancers. The limitations of biomarkers challenge early detection and monitoring of chemoresistance and cancer relapse.MethodsTo evaluate the potential of piRNA as a diagnostic biomarker in oncology, we systematically reviewed previous studies on the subject. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to evaluate the diagnostic relevance of piRNAs in cancer. Eighteen studies (2,352 patients) were included. The quality of each study was evaluated with AMSTAR and QUADAS-2 tool.Results & conclusionsThe area under the curve (AUC) values of 26 piRNAs in patients with cancer ranged from 0.624 to 0.978, with piR-9491 showing the highest value (0.978). The sensitivity of the total of 21 piRNAs in cancer patients was between 42.86 and 100, with piR-9491 showing the highest sensitivity (100). The specificity of these 21 piRNAs ranged from 60.10 to 96.67 (with piR-018569 showing the highest specificity (96.67)). Their odds ratios were between 1.61 and 44.67, and piR-12488 showed the highest odds ratio (44.67). Generally, the piRNAs in this review showed better sensitivity and AUC values than current clinical diagnostic biomarkers, although current biomarkers appear to be more specific. Reviewed piRNAs showed better diagnostic performance than currently used clinical biomarkers. Notably, piR-823 showed a significant diagnostic performance in four types of cancer (colorectal, esophageal, gastric, and renal cell cancer). However, all 18 studies included in this review were a case-control study. So, further prospective studies are required for their validation.