Family forest ownership incorporates economic as well as several other motivations. While traditional rural livelihood has lost significance in the Nordic countries, multiple motives of forest owners have risen to the forefront of guiding owners' forest management behavior. At the same time, the requirements of international forest and environmental agreements force national policies to safeguard biodiversity and pay attention to many other ecosystem services more efficiently. The recent success of voluntary biodiversity protection schemes in Finnish family forests has raised the need for investigating further the emotional factors that affect forest owners’ behavior and decision-making. The present paper assesses the values and attitudes b...
This study focuses on the values, fairness, and legitimacy of forest-related decision-making in Finl...
The article reviews typologies of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners' values values, attitu...
Ten million family forest owners own 35 percent of US forestland. Although one owner\u27s action may...
This study aimed at figuring out the distributions of spatial and temporal scales of Finnish family ...
Forest management decisions can be seen as economic choices. The assumption of rational and economic...
The ongoing Forest Biodiversity Programme METSO largely relies on voluntary participation of family ...
Forest management guidelines changed at the end of the 1990’s in Finland. Biodiversity, visual lands...
Abstract The number of family forest owners in the USA has increased contin-uously in recent decades...
Abstract Wide consensus exists that there is a need to extend forest conservation for maintaining bi...
Finnish forest industry is under intensive pressure to alter its ways of functioning. Especially in ...
Forests are considered crucial assets for sustainable rural development, and contemporary forestry i...
The present study focused on how forests will be managed in the future in light of the increased emp...
In boreal commercial forests, carbon sequestration, climate change adaptation, and biodiversity cons...
Recent demographic changes in the forest-owner structure are suspected to have led to the increasing...
Protecting biodiversity within separate set-aside conservation areas has not been effective enough t...
This study focuses on the values, fairness, and legitimacy of forest-related decision-making in Finl...
The article reviews typologies of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners' values values, attitu...
Ten million family forest owners own 35 percent of US forestland. Although one owner\u27s action may...
This study aimed at figuring out the distributions of spatial and temporal scales of Finnish family ...
Forest management decisions can be seen as economic choices. The assumption of rational and economic...
The ongoing Forest Biodiversity Programme METSO largely relies on voluntary participation of family ...
Forest management guidelines changed at the end of the 1990’s in Finland. Biodiversity, visual lands...
Abstract The number of family forest owners in the USA has increased contin-uously in recent decades...
Abstract Wide consensus exists that there is a need to extend forest conservation for maintaining bi...
Finnish forest industry is under intensive pressure to alter its ways of functioning. Especially in ...
Forests are considered crucial assets for sustainable rural development, and contemporary forestry i...
The present study focused on how forests will be managed in the future in light of the increased emp...
In boreal commercial forests, carbon sequestration, climate change adaptation, and biodiversity cons...
Recent demographic changes in the forest-owner structure are suspected to have led to the increasing...
Protecting biodiversity within separate set-aside conservation areas has not been effective enough t...
This study focuses on the values, fairness, and legitimacy of forest-related decision-making in Finl...
The article reviews typologies of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners' values values, attitu...
Ten million family forest owners own 35 percent of US forestland. Although one owner\u27s action may...