The debate over the Free Trade Agreement with the United States has produced a book, How to Kill a Country, primarily concerned with intellectual property and related issues (Weiss, Thurbon and Matthews 2004). In arguing that Australia will be worse off, Weiss, Thurbon and Matthews examine four areas of policy: pharmaceuticals, quarantine, copyright and government procurement. The implications of the Agreement in these policy areas forms the remainder of this paper. Of the four issues, pharmaceuticals were the most controversial in the debate over the Agreement and raised the most difficult economic issues, and will therefore be the primary focus of attention
Tony Abbott is wrong about the threat to the Australia’s pharmaceutical scheme, says Mike Will...
On 1 January 2005, a controversial trade agreement entered into force between Australia and the Unit...
With the third round of trade negotiations currently underway, this paper explores possible conseque...
The debate over the Free Trade Agreement with the United States has produced a book, How to Kill a C...
Three of Australia's top policy analysts have investigated the fine print in the Australia-US Free T...
Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agreement with the US...
Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agreement with the US...
ABSTRACT Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agree-ment w...
New protections for intellectual property owners sit oddly in a free trade agreement, argues Mike Wi...
The Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) covers a number of issues and this paper by David Ric...
Research Doctorate - Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)In January 2005 Australia implemented the Australia-U...
• The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) contains major concessions to the US pha...
Objective: The debate on the extent intellectual property protection should be used to reward innova...
Much of the rhetoric that underpins arguments for free trade relies on the assertion that free tra...
The Australia-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), which entered into force on January 1, 2005, conta...
Tony Abbott is wrong about the threat to the Australia’s pharmaceutical scheme, says Mike Will...
On 1 January 2005, a controversial trade agreement entered into force between Australia and the Unit...
With the third round of trade negotiations currently underway, this paper explores possible conseque...
The debate over the Free Trade Agreement with the United States has produced a book, How to Kill a C...
Three of Australia's top policy analysts have investigated the fine print in the Australia-US Free T...
Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agreement with the US...
Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agreement with the US...
ABSTRACT Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agree-ment w...
New protections for intellectual property owners sit oddly in a free trade agreement, argues Mike Wi...
The Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) covers a number of issues and this paper by David Ric...
Research Doctorate - Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)In January 2005 Australia implemented the Australia-U...
• The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) contains major concessions to the US pha...
Objective: The debate on the extent intellectual property protection should be used to reward innova...
Much of the rhetoric that underpins arguments for free trade relies on the assertion that free tra...
The Australia-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), which entered into force on January 1, 2005, conta...
Tony Abbott is wrong about the threat to the Australia’s pharmaceutical scheme, says Mike Will...
On 1 January 2005, a controversial trade agreement entered into force between Australia and the Unit...
With the third round of trade negotiations currently underway, this paper explores possible conseque...