Canada and Mexico are formally challenging US country of origin (COOL) legislation at the World Trade Organization. The industries most affected by COOL are beef and pork. The effect of COOL on North American cross border supply chains is outlined. The areas of international trade law upon which a challenge could be mounted are explained and the key issues that a disputes panel would have to determine indicated. The nature of the evidence that may be required to bolster Canada’s case is outlined
This paper examines the Article 22.6 arbitration report of the WTO dispute over the United States’ c...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Canada and Mexico are formally challenging US country of origin (COOL) legislation at the World Trad...
COOL, WTO, labelling, despite, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade,
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors Canada and Mexico, who say that th...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
This report covers the country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department o...
Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) regulation has been applied in the United States meat sector sinc...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) is a component of the 2002 US Farm Bill. The provision requires t...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
This paper examines the World Trade Organization’s Article 22.6 arbitration report on the dispute ov...
This paper examines the Article 22.6 arbitration report of the WTO dispute over the United States’ c...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...
Canada and Mexico are formally challenging US country of origin (COOL) legislation at the World Trad...
COOL, WTO, labelling, despite, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade,
This report covers the dispute between the U.S with its neighbors Canada and Mexico, who say that th...
The COOL (Country of Origing Labelling) measure is a US internal measure, as opposed to a customs or...
Mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) has become a thorny issue in U.S.–Canada bilateral trade...
In recent years, many agricultural products, namely beef and pork, have been subject to country of o...
Country of origin labeling (COOL) is a common practice. It occurs routinely for many products in man...
This report covers the country-of-origin labeling (COOL) system implemented by the U.S. Department o...
Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) regulation has been applied in the United States meat sector sinc...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) is a component of the 2002 US Farm Bill. The provision requires t...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for meat products have been a debated subject since its implementa...
This paper examines the World Trade Organization’s Article 22.6 arbitration report on the dispute ov...
This paper examines the Article 22.6 arbitration report of the WTO dispute over the United States’ c...
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) was introduced in 2002 but not implemented until September, 2008. ...
After years of discussions, compromises, and revisions, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS...