Crop yields, farm income risk and returns, and soil losses were simulated from 1974 to 1984 for southeastern Washington Palouse-region farms in three climatic subregions under alternative conservation and commodity policy scenarios. Historical commodity programs reinforced preexisting disincentives to retire highly erodible land to perennial grasses, but cropland base protection (CBP) legislation would eliminate such disincentives and increase profitability and decrease risk of land retirement. Nevertheless, additional incentives would be needed. Government rental payments can provide necessary incentives, but they are more costly without CBP. CBP was not included in the 1985 farm bill
Government subsidies and crop insurance indemnities provide important support for many U.S. farmers....
Conservation Titles of the 1985 Food Security Act lead to agricultural market and resource use adjus...
(FSA) is unique in the history of farm legislation. Its distinction arises, not because conservation...
Crop yields, farm income risk and returns, and soil losses were simulated from 1974 to 1984 for sout...
Crop yields, farm income risk and returns, and soil losses were simulated from 1974 to 1984 for sout...
Crop yields, farm income, and soil losses were simulated over 1974-84 for southeastern Washington fa...
Predicted crop yields and wind erosion rates from a multi-year/multi-crop growth simulation model pr...
This paper presents a mathematical model incorporating production returns and government payments to...
Predicted crop yields and wind erosion rates from a multi-year/multi-crop growth simulation model pr...
This paper examines the policy instrument by which a land retirement program designed primarily for ...
In previous farm bills, policymakers recognized that conservation incentives were imperative to offs...
Changes to commodity programs in the 2002 Farm Bill increased the value of crop base acreages on whi...
Changes to commodity programs in the 2002 Farm Bill increased the value of crop base acreages on whi...
A.E. Ext. 86-09The 1985 farm bill directs the USDA to establish an acreage conservation reserve prog...
The 50/92 and 0/92 reduced planting alternatives of the 1985 farm bill allow farm program participan...
Government subsidies and crop insurance indemnities provide important support for many U.S. farmers....
Conservation Titles of the 1985 Food Security Act lead to agricultural market and resource use adjus...
(FSA) is unique in the history of farm legislation. Its distinction arises, not because conservation...
Crop yields, farm income risk and returns, and soil losses were simulated from 1974 to 1984 for sout...
Crop yields, farm income risk and returns, and soil losses were simulated from 1974 to 1984 for sout...
Crop yields, farm income, and soil losses were simulated over 1974-84 for southeastern Washington fa...
Predicted crop yields and wind erosion rates from a multi-year/multi-crop growth simulation model pr...
This paper presents a mathematical model incorporating production returns and government payments to...
Predicted crop yields and wind erosion rates from a multi-year/multi-crop growth simulation model pr...
This paper examines the policy instrument by which a land retirement program designed primarily for ...
In previous farm bills, policymakers recognized that conservation incentives were imperative to offs...
Changes to commodity programs in the 2002 Farm Bill increased the value of crop base acreages on whi...
Changes to commodity programs in the 2002 Farm Bill increased the value of crop base acreages on whi...
A.E. Ext. 86-09The 1985 farm bill directs the USDA to establish an acreage conservation reserve prog...
The 50/92 and 0/92 reduced planting alternatives of the 1985 farm bill allow farm program participan...
Government subsidies and crop insurance indemnities provide important support for many U.S. farmers....
Conservation Titles of the 1985 Food Security Act lead to agricultural market and resource use adjus...
(FSA) is unique in the history of farm legislation. Its distinction arises, not because conservation...