The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs of its implementation. This study uses data from a Vickery auction (n=320) to estimate willingness to pay for COOL. Preliminary findings suggest, on average, consumers value COOL, are not homogenous, and prefer fresh produce grown in the U.S
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In 2002, Chicago and Denver consumers were surveyed and participated in an experimental auction to e...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
Consumers are becoming increasingly concerned with the quality, safety, and production attributes of...
Data are collected from primary shoppers in Gainesville Florida, Atlanta Georgia and Lansing Michiga...
Data are collected from primary shoppers in Gainesville Florida, Atlanta Georgia and Lansing Michiga...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
Mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) is a policy that requires a label noting what country or...
Copyright Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, April 2005In this paper, we assess consumer wi...
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In 2002, Chicago and Denver consumers were surveyed and participated in an experimental auction to e...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
The debate about Country-of-Origin labeling (COOL) has centered on the projected benefits and costs ...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
Consumers are becoming increasingly concerned with the quality, safety, and production attributes of...
Data are collected from primary shoppers in Gainesville Florida, Atlanta Georgia and Lansing Michiga...
Data are collected from primary shoppers in Gainesville Florida, Atlanta Georgia and Lansing Michiga...
This paper investigates the relationships between country of origin labeling (COOL) issues and consu...
Mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) is a policy that requires a label noting what country or...
Copyright Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, April 2005In this paper, we assess consumer wi...
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COO...
In 2002, Chicago and Denver consumers were surveyed and participated in an experimental auction to e...