How does law possess the normative force it requires to direct our actions? This book argues that this seemingly innocuous question is of central importance to the philosophy of law and, by extension, of the very concept of law itself. It advances a position grounded in the secular natural law tradition, and in doing so addresses the two success criteria for this position head on: Firstly, that commitment to the existence of a supreme moral principle is required; Secondly, that any supreme moral principle must be identifiable through human reason. The book argues that these conditions are met by Alan Gewirth's Principle of Generic Consistency (PGC), which - through a dialectically necessary argument - locates the existence of universall...
This paper examines the problem of normativity in contemporary legal theory, paying particular atten...
Why care about what the law has to say? It aims to guide our actions, but its grounds for doing so a...
Law and morality are not the same, but the related phenomena. The aforementioned difference requires...
Olsen and Toddington argue that there is a logical connection between law and moral rationality - ag...
Olsen and Toddington argue that there is a logical connection between law and moral rationality - ag...
How does law possess the normative force it requires to direct our actions? This seemingly innocuous...
The received view on the nature of legal authority contains the idea that a sound account of legitim...
This book offers a 'genealogical' explanation of law's normativity. The term 'genealogical' conveys ...
We are subject to many different norms telling us how to act, from moral norms to etiquette rules an...
If laws are just made up, then why do we have to follow them? What normative force do they have? It ...
The problem addressed in this article is the relationship between law and morality. It is asked (1) ...
This thesis defends a unified theory of morality and law: the one-system view or the normative conti...
Most theorists agree that our social order includes a distinctive legal dimension. A fundamental que...
The book's argument moves from discussing the relation between law and power. Theories defending the...
Rationalism of human nature demands to know the moral foundations and legitimacy made by human decis...
This paper examines the problem of normativity in contemporary legal theory, paying particular atten...
Why care about what the law has to say? It aims to guide our actions, but its grounds for doing so a...
Law and morality are not the same, but the related phenomena. The aforementioned difference requires...
Olsen and Toddington argue that there is a logical connection between law and moral rationality - ag...
Olsen and Toddington argue that there is a logical connection between law and moral rationality - ag...
How does law possess the normative force it requires to direct our actions? This seemingly innocuous...
The received view on the nature of legal authority contains the idea that a sound account of legitim...
This book offers a 'genealogical' explanation of law's normativity. The term 'genealogical' conveys ...
We are subject to many different norms telling us how to act, from moral norms to etiquette rules an...
If laws are just made up, then why do we have to follow them? What normative force do they have? It ...
The problem addressed in this article is the relationship between law and morality. It is asked (1) ...
This thesis defends a unified theory of morality and law: the one-system view or the normative conti...
Most theorists agree that our social order includes a distinctive legal dimension. A fundamental que...
The book's argument moves from discussing the relation between law and power. Theories defending the...
Rationalism of human nature demands to know the moral foundations and legitimacy made by human decis...
This paper examines the problem of normativity in contemporary legal theory, paying particular atten...
Why care about what the law has to say? It aims to guide our actions, but its grounds for doing so a...
Law and morality are not the same, but the related phenomena. The aforementioned difference requires...