This article discusses the findings of empirical research into the working habits of defence attorneys. Contrary to what is implied by the current expression “plea bargaining”, it is not the plea but the sentence which is the real object of the negotiations taking place between the prosecution and the defence. When no agreement is reached between the Crown prosecutor and the defence attorney, they resort to formal representations made before the judge during a sentencing hearing and argue for their conflicting recommendations. Hence, it is not a criminal trial but a formal sentencing hearing, where both parties argue their case, which is the outcome of a failure of the Crown and defence attor...
In this paper, the author deals with the legal foundations of judicial control over errors of law al...
Discussion of prisoners' rights has often been the centre of attention over the past twenty y...
This article outlines the difficulties which were felt to exist in the prerogative orders of certior...
This article presents the principal results of a study on plea bargaining at the Montreal Jus...
This paper explores the relations between different clinical perspectives in criminology, and...
This paper tries to shed a light on the attrition process and on the factors influencing the sentenc...
To date, no one really knows exactly how cases go through the maze of legal proceedings after being ...
The main objective of this essay is to put forward some ideas in the right to punish. These ideas ar...
The analysis of plea bargaining and diversion shows how criminological theories and principles are s...
Based on the results of an empirical study on the judicial treatment of cases of assault and ...
This paper was originally given at the Congrès Henri Capitant to an audience composed mainly of Cont...
This letter deals with two major questions. The first shows how the “program” of criminology ...
Dans cet article, l'auteur analyse les relations qui s'effectuent entre les sciences judiciaires et ...
Certain conflicts between offenders over their illicit activities end in the murder of one of...
In October 1987, an experimental program was introduced in the Montreal Law Courts, inviting victims...
In this paper, the author deals with the legal foundations of judicial control over errors of law al...
Discussion of prisoners' rights has often been the centre of attention over the past twenty y...
This article outlines the difficulties which were felt to exist in the prerogative orders of certior...
This article presents the principal results of a study on plea bargaining at the Montreal Jus...
This paper explores the relations between different clinical perspectives in criminology, and...
This paper tries to shed a light on the attrition process and on the factors influencing the sentenc...
To date, no one really knows exactly how cases go through the maze of legal proceedings after being ...
The main objective of this essay is to put forward some ideas in the right to punish. These ideas ar...
The analysis of plea bargaining and diversion shows how criminological theories and principles are s...
Based on the results of an empirical study on the judicial treatment of cases of assault and ...
This paper was originally given at the Congrès Henri Capitant to an audience composed mainly of Cont...
This letter deals with two major questions. The first shows how the “program” of criminology ...
Dans cet article, l'auteur analyse les relations qui s'effectuent entre les sciences judiciaires et ...
Certain conflicts between offenders over their illicit activities end in the murder of one of...
In October 1987, an experimental program was introduced in the Montreal Law Courts, inviting victims...
In this paper, the author deals with the legal foundations of judicial control over errors of law al...
Discussion of prisoners' rights has often been the centre of attention over the past twenty y...
This article outlines the difficulties which were felt to exist in the prerogative orders of certior...