This paper examines whether the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation\u27s supervisory actions promote improved performance at problem banks. I show that during the three-year period following the termination of a supervisory action, return on assets rises by 10 to 20 basis points. The reaction of capital markets to the termination results in a 1.7 basis point increase in return on assets, while management actions post-termination result in a 1.6 basis point decrease in return on assets
Banks are generally failed and placed in receivership when the value of their assets declines below ...
At yearend 1991, Congress enacted fundamental deposit insurance reform for banks and thrifts in the ...
Cases the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursues against the directors and officers of...
Employing a unique data set for the period 2000-2010, this paper examines the impact of enforcement ...
We examine market movement and depositors’ reaction following the announcement of enforcement action...
We examine market movement and depositors’ reaction following the announcement of enforcement action...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DO...
Using an extensive dataset of manually collected enforcement actions (EA) on US banks, we provide ne...
Since 1990, federal bank supervisors have publicly announced formal enforcement actions. This change...
The following study investigates whether Enforcement Actions placed on banks for misbehaving, have a...
We present a novel way to examine macro-financial linkages by focusing on the real effects of bank s...
Cases the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursues against the directors and officers of...
Employing a unique data set for the period 2000-2010, this paper examines the impact of formal enfor...
We highlight an important macro-financial linkage: Severe regulatory enforcement actions such as For...
The banking industry in the United States has held many forms and has faced differing su pervision a...
Banks are generally failed and placed in receivership when the value of their assets declines below ...
At yearend 1991, Congress enacted fundamental deposit insurance reform for banks and thrifts in the ...
Cases the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursues against the directors and officers of...
Employing a unique data set for the period 2000-2010, this paper examines the impact of enforcement ...
We examine market movement and depositors’ reaction following the announcement of enforcement action...
We examine market movement and depositors’ reaction following the announcement of enforcement action...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DO...
Using an extensive dataset of manually collected enforcement actions (EA) on US banks, we provide ne...
Since 1990, federal bank supervisors have publicly announced formal enforcement actions. This change...
The following study investigates whether Enforcement Actions placed on banks for misbehaving, have a...
We present a novel way to examine macro-financial linkages by focusing on the real effects of bank s...
Cases the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursues against the directors and officers of...
Employing a unique data set for the period 2000-2010, this paper examines the impact of formal enfor...
We highlight an important macro-financial linkage: Severe regulatory enforcement actions such as For...
The banking industry in the United States has held many forms and has faced differing su pervision a...
Banks are generally failed and placed in receivership when the value of their assets declines below ...
At yearend 1991, Congress enacted fundamental deposit insurance reform for banks and thrifts in the ...
Cases the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) pursues against the directors and officers of...