Nineteen thirty-four: it was a year that changed Hollywood history. After decades of studio production codes, agitation for censorship, and broken promises, in the spring and summer of 1934 prominent reform groups organized and banded together to threaten a boycott strong enough to cripple the massive Hollywood complex itself. Major studios, already in difficult financial straits because of Depression losses and debts left over from theater building and the recent conversion to sound, were cowed at the possibility of a massive consumer boycott. They agreed (not for the first time) to abide by a strict code of movie morals, and this time they (more or less) stuck to it, inaugurating what would later be known as the Golden Age of Hollywood
Film has continually been a medium with as great a propensity to entertain and inform as a propensit...
This dissertation explores the origins of the American entertainment industry, revealing the network...
In its 1915 decision in Mutual Film v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, the Supreme Court held that mo...
Nineteen thirty-four: it was a year that changed Hollywood history. After decades of studio producti...
This article discusses the efforts made in the early 20th century to censor certain things in both t...
This dissertation argues that scholars should not equate the demise of vaudeville as a cultural indu...
This article discusses the movie boycotts of 1934. These were started because religious groups, esp...
Practically from its origins, and especially once it had been consolidated as a spectacle for mass c...
In the postwar era, the lure of controversy sold movie tickets as much as the promise of entertainme...
The American movie industry did not have to develop into the Hollywood dream factory. There were edu...
This paper discusses the issue of censorship in Hollywood and beyond from the onset of the Pro...
The proliferation of movies at the turn of the twentieth century attracted not only the attention of...
From July 1, 1934, to November 1, 1968, the Production Code Administration (PCA) oversaw the creatio...
Historical investigation of film audiences and conditions of reception is an underdeveloped area of ...
This paper is a study of the conservative political bias inherent to the Motion Picture Production C...
Film has continually been a medium with as great a propensity to entertain and inform as a propensit...
This dissertation explores the origins of the American entertainment industry, revealing the network...
In its 1915 decision in Mutual Film v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, the Supreme Court held that mo...
Nineteen thirty-four: it was a year that changed Hollywood history. After decades of studio producti...
This article discusses the efforts made in the early 20th century to censor certain things in both t...
This dissertation argues that scholars should not equate the demise of vaudeville as a cultural indu...
This article discusses the movie boycotts of 1934. These were started because religious groups, esp...
Practically from its origins, and especially once it had been consolidated as a spectacle for mass c...
In the postwar era, the lure of controversy sold movie tickets as much as the promise of entertainme...
The American movie industry did not have to develop into the Hollywood dream factory. There were edu...
This paper discusses the issue of censorship in Hollywood and beyond from the onset of the Pro...
The proliferation of movies at the turn of the twentieth century attracted not only the attention of...
From July 1, 1934, to November 1, 1968, the Production Code Administration (PCA) oversaw the creatio...
Historical investigation of film audiences and conditions of reception is an underdeveloped area of ...
This paper is a study of the conservative political bias inherent to the Motion Picture Production C...
Film has continually been a medium with as great a propensity to entertain and inform as a propensit...
This dissertation explores the origins of the American entertainment industry, revealing the network...
In its 1915 decision in Mutual Film v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, the Supreme Court held that mo...