Sex-specific selection in different environments

Sexual selection is a prevalent evolutionary force that prominently led to the evolution of elaborate and conspicuous traits. However, it remains an ongoing scientific debate if sexual selection has a net negative or positive effect on the general viability of a population (from here on ‘population fitness’). Sexual selection could reduce the fitness of a population, when sexual conflict leads to, for example, one sex harming the other during mating. By contrast, sexual selection could increase population fitness, if it increases selection against deleterious alleles in the gene pool. This could be the case if sexual selection acts on traits that capture the genetic quality of an individual. Indeed, recent meta-analytic evidence suggests that sexual selection typically increases population fitness. Therefore, the strength of sexual selection could prove important for the fitness of wild populations facing environmental stress. Importantly, the strength of sexual selection can differ fundamentally between the sexes and also among populations or species. One reason that might trigger this variation is the interdependence of evolutionary and ecological processes, also known as eco-evolutionary dynamics. Therefore, studying eco-evolutionary dynamics could help us to understand the vast variation in sexual selection and to predict the effect of sexual selection on population fitness. I studied different pathways of eco-evolutionary dynamics in diverse environments using experimental and comparative approaches: First, I investigated the effect of diet quality on the strength of selection in females and males in a model insect. I show that low diet quality increased the potential for selection in males and females, but surprisingly the effect of diet was particularly pronounced in females. This suggests that deteriorating diet quality might be predominantly stressful for females and could disproportionally increase selection on females compared to males. Overall, this study provides an example of how an ecological factor can influence the strength of selection. Secondly, I performed an experimental study to test the effect of a key demographic factor on sexual selection. To this end, I manipulated the density of populations of the red flour beetle by changing population size as well as habitat size. By quantifying mating behaviour and fitness, I demonstrated that an increase in density can have an impact on the potential for sexual selection. Especially in females, higher densities caused an increase in sexual selection, whereas in males, higher densities mainly increased the benefitted of additional matings. These effects were most profound when varying density through the number of individuals, whereas habitat size barely affected sexual selection. Collectively, this suggests that density dependent sexual selection mediates eco-evolutionary dynamics, which can be particularly important for the fitness of declining populations. Thirdly, I took a comparative approach to study how the strength of selection in general might alter the demography of populations, specifically their carrying capacity (i.e. the limit for population growth). Since population growth is typically limited by females, strong selection on males can affect the carrying capacity of a population. If selection is typically stronger in males compared to females, females could benefit from selection against deleterious alleles in males without the reduction in population growth imposed by strong selection on females. I compiled data on the genetic variance in fitness for females and males as a measure for the strength of selection. I found that selection is typically stronger in males compared to females across the animal kingdom. Sexual selection theory suggests that such a sex-difference in the strength of selection could be caused by stronger sexual selection on males. Indeed, the sex difference in selection strength was only significant in polygamous and not in socially monogamous species, with the latter presumably experiencing weaker sexual selection. In conclusion, these data suggest that in polygamous species selection is typically stronger on males compared to females and the sex-specific strength of selection could have an effect on the carrying capacity of populations. After exploring the relevance of sexual selection in the previous chapters, I fourthly, tested the robustness of a widely used and easily obtainable proxy for the strength of sexual selection across species: sexual size dimorphism. Theory predicts that sexual selection on males promotes the evolution of larger males relative to females. Indeed, my comparative study shows that the degree of sexual size dimorphism was significantly correlated with the strength of sexual selection, estimated by a diverse range of proxies for the strength of sexual selection from primary studies. Importantly, pre-copulatory sexual selection correlated positively with an increasing male-bias in sexual size dimorphism, while post-copulatory sexual selection was non-significantly negatively associated with the degree of male-bias in sexual size dimorphism. Overall, these data suggest that sexual size dimorphism can be a useful, albeit rough, proxy for the strength of pre-copulatory sexual selection across species. In the final chapter, I synthesise the results of my studies in the light of their implications for eco-evolutionary dynamics. While there is evidence that sexual selection could typically improve population fitness, the data I present suggest that the ecology of a population, here specifically diet quality and population density, could have a crucial impact on the strength of (sexual) selection. Hence, unravelling the eco-evolutionary dynamics of (sexual) selection could prove important for our understanding of their effect on population fitness. Importantly, selection seems to be typically stronger in males compared to females, at least in species with prevalent sexual selection on males. Overall, further exploration of the eco-evolutionary dynamics of sexual selection and their effects on population fitness promise to be exciting and profitable future endeavours