Training parents in the evaluation of the individualized education plan (IEP) process

Active parental involvement in the special education process has historically been emphasized. In addition, legal impetus (94-142, 766) has been provided for this active involvement. However, research has indicated that some educators tend to disregard, manipulate, and often intimidate parents during special education TEAM meetings, thus violating their due process rights. As a result, parental involvement in the Team process and development of the IEP document has continued to be lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate parental attitudes toward the Team process and the IEP document and to implement a training program designed to assist parents in the development of the skills necessary to critically analyze their child\u27s IEP document\u27s effectiveness. The underlying theory behind the training program was, that given the appropriate training and information, parental skills to effectively participate in the Team meeting and development of the IEP document would increase. A group of 15 parents from the central Massachusetts area participated in this study. Their experiences within Special Education ranged from 3 months to 11 years. Severity of the handicapping conditions of their children ranged from speech/language services to full time special education. A pre/post test design was utilized to evaluate parental perception of the Team process and IEP evaluative skills. Based on the data gleaned from this research, the following has been concluded: (1) in spite of 17 years of mandated involvement in the Team process and development of the IEP document at the Team level, the parents; (a) view the child\u27s IEP as not being the product of the entire Team\u27s input, and (b) indicated that they did not participate in the development of the document. In regards to qualitative effectiveness of the IEP, it was determined that: (1) the student profile section; (a) did not contain all of the mandated information, and (b) was not concisely written. In addition, other information (teaching strategies, service delivery and plan duration) was not contained within. In spite of their passive roles, the parents generally expressed satisfaction with their child\u27s program and IEP document. The need for parent training and professional staff development was cited