Following lengthy and highly contested divorce proceedings, the Nevada Court of Appeals reviews a district court’s alimony determinations, attorney fee awards, and disposition of community property for an abuse of discretion. The district court adopted Respondent’s order in its entirety without modification, and the Nevada Court of Appeals determined whether this constitutes an abuse of discretion in and of itself. The Nevada Court of Appeals held that utilizing a party’s proposed order does not in and of itself constitute an abuse of discretion, but that courts who adopted litigant-drafted orders assume the risk that any legal or factual errors contained in the order might be reversible. The Court went on to urge courts and practitioners t...
After her ex-husband, Grady Byrd, suddenly stopped making payments pursuant to their 2014 divorce de...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the district court must consider the factors from the Third Resta...
This discusses whether Nevada justice courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to suppress illega...
The Court considered whether a party may appeal a district court’s order granting an NRCP 60(b) moti...
Deviations from the Nevada Administration Code’s framework for calculating a parent’s base child sup...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
The Nevada Court of Appeals determined that the recent amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Proce...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
In an opinion written by Justice Hardesty, the Nevada Supreme Court evaluated whether assignment of ...
Jordan v. State rules on two separate appeals that address the same issue of first impression regard...
After her ex-husband, Grady Byrd, suddenly stopped making payments pursuant to their 2014 divorce de...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...
The court considered consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a district court order granti...
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the district court must consider the factors from the Third Resta...
This discusses whether Nevada justice courts have jurisdiction to rule on motions to suppress illega...
The Court considered whether a party may appeal a district court’s order granting an NRCP 60(b) moti...
Deviations from the Nevada Administration Code’s framework for calculating a parent’s base child sup...
The Court determined that (1) family courts have subject matter jurisdiction in divorce proceedings ...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
The Supreme Court denied petitioners’ application for a writ of mandamus for abuse of the district c...
The Nevada Court of Appeals determined that the recent amendments to the Nevada Rules of Civil Proce...
The Nevada Supreme Court considered whether the district court properly applied Nevada’s anti-SLAPP ...
In an opinion written by Justice Hardesty, the Nevada Supreme Court evaluated whether assignment of ...
Jordan v. State rules on two separate appeals that address the same issue of first impression regard...
After her ex-husband, Grady Byrd, suddenly stopped making payments pursuant to their 2014 divorce de...
The Court determined that (1) the spousal exception bars recovery from the Nevada Real Estate Educat...
The Court determined that (1) NRS 155.190(1)(h) only grants the Court appellate jurisdiction over th...