n 1990, the Visual Artists’ Rights Act (VARA) became a welcome addition to the federal Copyright Act of 1976. VARA was the first time the “moral rights” of an artist were federally protected in the United States. Moral rights are commonly understood to provide attribution to artists and protect the integrity of visual art pieces. Under VARA, this means authors have a right to claim authorship on pieces they create, prevent the use of their name on a work they did not create, and prohibit the destruction of works of “recognized statute” (both intentional and through gross negligence). The law aims to prevent intentional distortion or modification of visual art pieces that is “prejudicial” to the artists’ “honor or reputation.” This post was ...
The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) may represent the most important artists\u27 rights leg...
The author reflects on the meaning both of the shocking prices currently being paid for many works o...
This Note argues that market participants should be indemnified against legally baseless revocations...
The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) grants an artist the broad power to “prevent any intent...
This article addresses the background, provisions, and brief history of the Visual Artists Rights Ac...
Consider the following: Building Owner commissions Artist to paint a mural on the wall of his buildi...
In 2010, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit confronted the novel question of when moral righ...
VARA is the first federal legislation allowing American artists to protect their works\u27 integrity...
The Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) was enacted by Congress in 1990 in order to bring our laws into...
Using as a case study the recent “5Pointz” litigation, a case involving visual artists’ moral-rights...
While eleven states have enacted legislation creating moral rights for artists, until recently there...
This note introduces and provides a brief legislative history of the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA...
This paper considers the extent to which federal moral rights law protects authorized graffiti and a...
At first glance, a federal statute protecting the moral rights of artists and their artwork seems li...
This paper considers the extent to which federal moral rights law protects authorized graffiti and a...
The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) may represent the most important artists\u27 rights leg...
The author reflects on the meaning both of the shocking prices currently being paid for many works o...
This Note argues that market participants should be indemnified against legally baseless revocations...
The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) grants an artist the broad power to “prevent any intent...
This article addresses the background, provisions, and brief history of the Visual Artists Rights Ac...
Consider the following: Building Owner commissions Artist to paint a mural on the wall of his buildi...
In 2010, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit confronted the novel question of when moral righ...
VARA is the first federal legislation allowing American artists to protect their works\u27 integrity...
The Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) was enacted by Congress in 1990 in order to bring our laws into...
Using as a case study the recent “5Pointz” litigation, a case involving visual artists’ moral-rights...
While eleven states have enacted legislation creating moral rights for artists, until recently there...
This note introduces and provides a brief legislative history of the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA...
This paper considers the extent to which federal moral rights law protects authorized graffiti and a...
At first glance, a federal statute protecting the moral rights of artists and their artwork seems li...
This paper considers the extent to which federal moral rights law protects authorized graffiti and a...
The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) may represent the most important artists\u27 rights leg...
The author reflects on the meaning both of the shocking prices currently being paid for many works o...
This Note argues that market participants should be indemnified against legally baseless revocations...