An assessment of urologists\u27 training and knowledge of energy-based surgical devices.

OBJECTIVE: To assess surgeons\u27 training and current understanding of existing energy-based surgical instrumentation (ESI), we disseminated an online questionnaire to urology residents, fellows and attending urologists. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A two part 24-question survey was disseminated to 1000 urology residents, fellows and attending physicians. The first part of the questionnaire assessed the respondents\u27 demographics and education about ESI; the second part evaluated the respondent\u27s knowledge of surgical energy methods and ESI, and was stratified into nine basic- and six advanced-knowledge questions. RESULTS: In all, 136 people (13.6%) viewed the survey and it was completed by 63 (6.3%). Respondents comprised 27 (43%) attending physicians, 14 (22%) minimally-invasive urology fellows and 22 (35%) urology residents. Among participants, 41 (64%) had received no formal didactic training on ESI, and a further 14% of respondents\u27 didactic experience was limited to one lecture. Of the respondents, 70% said that monopolar energy was the mode most often used in surgery. Overall, the participants correctly answered 41% of the questions. Of the nine questions classified as \u27basic\u27 knowledge, respondents correctly answered 49%. Of the six questions classified as \u27advanced\u27 knowledge, 29% were answered correctly. The highest percentage score was obtained by the attending urologists, with a mean (range) score of 41 (29-86)%, followed by the fellows, with a mean score of 39.5 (29-57)%, and then the residents, at 34 (14-64)%. CONCLUSION: Despite widespread and growing use of ESI, there is currently minimal formal training on energy modes and current energy devices being provided to urological surgeons. Both practising and training urologists have a limited understanding of surgical energy modes and of existing ESI