The publisher regrets that Table 1 has the wrong formatting. The correct version of the table is hereafter reported: The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
Unfortunately, there is a mistake in the published version of Table 1. In the last row of the table,...
A wrong version of table 11 was present in the manuscript. Its updated and corrected version, consis...
In the version of this Article originally published, A. Mollén’s affiliation was incorrectly denoted...
The publisher regrets that Table 1 has the wrong formatting. The correct version of the table is her...
The publisher regrets for the incorrect affiliation reported in the paper for one of the authors (S....
Figure 20.1 was not correct in the published article. The original article has been corrected. The p...
Owing to an unfortunate error during the production process, Table 9 was published with incorrect sp...
Inadvertently the authors omitted information in the caption of Figure 6, which should read: “Compac...
Nature Communications 1:55 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1052 (2010); Published 10 Aug 2010; Updated 19 Sep 201...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
\ua9 2020 The Author(s)The publisher regrets that incorrect colouring was applied to Figures 1–4. Th...
There is a typographical error in equation (3) as shown below: (Formula Presented) Moreover, there a...
The publisher regrets as the tables were not included in the article. (See Tables 1A, 1B, and Table ...
In the version of this Article originally published, A. Mollén’s affiliation was incorrectly denoted...
The paper ‘Asteroseismology of KIC 11754974: a high-amplitude SX Phe pulsator in a 343-d binary syst...
Unfortunately, there is a mistake in the published version of Table 1. In the last row of the table,...
A wrong version of table 11 was present in the manuscript. Its updated and corrected version, consis...
In the version of this Article originally published, A. Mollén’s affiliation was incorrectly denoted...
The publisher regrets that Table 1 has the wrong formatting. The correct version of the table is her...
The publisher regrets for the incorrect affiliation reported in the paper for one of the authors (S....
Figure 20.1 was not correct in the published article. The original article has been corrected. The p...
Owing to an unfortunate error during the production process, Table 9 was published with incorrect sp...
Inadvertently the authors omitted information in the caption of Figure 6, which should read: “Compac...
Nature Communications 1:55 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1052 (2010); Published 10 Aug 2010; Updated 19 Sep 201...
Due to an oversight of ours in proofreading and a communication problem with the publisher, the figu...
\ua9 2020 The Author(s)The publisher regrets that incorrect colouring was applied to Figures 1–4. Th...
There is a typographical error in equation (3) as shown below: (Formula Presented) Moreover, there a...
The publisher regrets as the tables were not included in the article. (See Tables 1A, 1B, and Table ...
In the version of this Article originally published, A. Mollén’s affiliation was incorrectly denoted...
The paper ‘Asteroseismology of KIC 11754974: a high-amplitude SX Phe pulsator in a 343-d binary syst...
Unfortunately, there is a mistake in the published version of Table 1. In the last row of the table,...
A wrong version of table 11 was present in the manuscript. Its updated and corrected version, consis...
In the version of this Article originally published, A. Mollén’s affiliation was incorrectly denoted...