The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires federal agencies to follow certain procedures prior to agency action. The Supreme Court held that the rationale behind the decision of Secretary of Commerce Ross to add a citizenship question to the Census 2020 to ensure enforcement of the Voting Rights Act was a ‘contrivance’ and violated the APA. The practical consequence of the decision was to prevent the question about citizenship from appearing on the 2020 census. Following the decision, President Trump announced an Executive Order concerning ‘Collecting Information about Citizenship Status in Connection with the Decennial Census’ which may also rely upon pretextual arguments that can be subsequently challenged in court
The Halloween season is traditionally a time for scares and surprises in the United States. This yea...
Recently, the newly created Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity sent a letter to ...
Trump v. New York appears to present the Supreme Court with a simple question of statutory construct...
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires federal agencies to follow certain procedures prior ...
In Department of Commerce v. New York, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed to put an end to the Trump Admi...
Politics Professor Steve Woolpert spoke to KTVU-TV/Fox2 about the Supreme Court\u27s June 27 ruling ...
ALL YOUR RESPONSES ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW: No matter what questions are asked...
After repeated setbacks in the courts, the Trump administration has given up on its efforts to place...
A Pretext . . . For What? In March 2018, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that the Trump Adm...
On June 27, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Department of Commerce v New York. T...
Over the past few days, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to hot-button Trump administ...
President Trump declared that he intends to eliminate birthright citizenship for non-citizens. Recog...
The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to rule on the third iteration of the Trump Administration’s tra...
Over the last decade, citizenship in the United States has become increasingly precarious. Denatural...
On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Trump v. Hawaii. The C...
The Halloween season is traditionally a time for scares and surprises in the United States. This yea...
Recently, the newly created Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity sent a letter to ...
Trump v. New York appears to present the Supreme Court with a simple question of statutory construct...
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires federal agencies to follow certain procedures prior ...
In Department of Commerce v. New York, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed to put an end to the Trump Admi...
Politics Professor Steve Woolpert spoke to KTVU-TV/Fox2 about the Supreme Court\u27s June 27 ruling ...
ALL YOUR RESPONSES ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW: No matter what questions are asked...
After repeated setbacks in the courts, the Trump administration has given up on its efforts to place...
A Pretext . . . For What? In March 2018, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced that the Trump Adm...
On June 27, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Department of Commerce v New York. T...
Over the past few days, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to hot-button Trump administ...
President Trump declared that he intends to eliminate birthright citizenship for non-citizens. Recog...
The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to rule on the third iteration of the Trump Administration’s tra...
Over the last decade, citizenship in the United States has become increasingly precarious. Denatural...
On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in Trump v. Hawaii. The C...
The Halloween season is traditionally a time for scares and surprises in the United States. This yea...
Recently, the newly created Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity sent a letter to ...
Trump v. New York appears to present the Supreme Court with a simple question of statutory construct...