Social criticism in dystopian novels Filio is not at Home and The Bird House

Antiutopična dela Filio ni doma, Ptičja hiša in 1984 vsebujejo različne elemente družbene kritike, ki jih v vseh treh romanih določam preko analize škodljivih dejavnikov za posameznike ali družbo v literarnem dogajanju. S pomočjo primerjave antiutopij opredelim razmerje med oblastjo in nadzorom ter se posvetim načinom, na katere se v romanih družbo nadzira. Elemente kritike družbe pojasnjujem in natančneje opredeljujem preko vpogleda v čas in kraj nastanka romanov, obenem pa ugotavljam, da so nekateri aspekti družbene kritike v delih večno aktualni.The dystopian works Filio is not at Home, The Bird House, and 1984 contain various elements of social criticism, which I determine in all three novels by analyzing factors harmful to individuals or society in literary events. By comparing dystopias, I define the relationship between power and control and focus on the ways in which society is controlled in the novels. I explain and more precisely define the elements of social criticism by referring to the time and place where the novels were written, while also noting that certain aspects of social criticism in the works remain timelessly relevant