In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of disclosure in informed consent to medical treatment, rejecting the application of the doctor-focused Bolam standard in favour of one focused on what was significant to patients. In Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 3756 (QB), despite acknowledging a new standard now applied, McGowan J nevertheless used the Bolam test to determine liability for non-disclosure. This illustrates ongoing judicial deference to the medical profession and this case commentary explores that decision and its implication
The law of informed consent to medical treatment has recently been extensively overhauled in England...
This article explores the scope and application of Chester v Afshar following Montgomery v Lanarkshi...
The UK Supreme Court ruling of Montgomery v Lanarkshire clarified that in obtaining informed consent...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of ...
In Hii Chii Kok v (1) Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien; (2) National Cancer Centre, the Singapore Court of...
In the context of medical advice to patients, the UK decision in Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Bo...
The UK Supreme Court held in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB (2015) that practitioners must take reasona...
The UK Supreme Court held in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB (2015) that practitioners must take reasona...
The UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board imposes a duty on healthcare professio...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] AC 1430, the UK Supreme Court confirmed that, under ...
Affirming the doctrine of informed consent, the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB bela...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, Lords Kerr and Reed referred to the increasing tendency to...
This editorial reviews the international lineage and also the ramifications of the decision by the U...
Of the myriad of pressing topics current in medical law and ethics, the issue of informed consent ap...
Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB is a deeply troubling decision when read closely. Paradoxically, its rul...
The law of informed consent to medical treatment has recently been extensively overhauled in England...
This article explores the scope and application of Chester v Afshar following Montgomery v Lanarkshi...
The UK Supreme Court ruling of Montgomery v Lanarkshire clarified that in obtaining informed consent...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of ...
In Hii Chii Kok v (1) Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien; (2) National Cancer Centre, the Singapore Court of...
In the context of medical advice to patients, the UK decision in Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Bo...
The UK Supreme Court held in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB (2015) that practitioners must take reasona...
The UK Supreme Court held in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB (2015) that practitioners must take reasona...
The UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board imposes a duty on healthcare professio...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] AC 1430, the UK Supreme Court confirmed that, under ...
Affirming the doctrine of informed consent, the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB bela...
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, Lords Kerr and Reed referred to the increasing tendency to...
This editorial reviews the international lineage and also the ramifications of the decision by the U...
Of the myriad of pressing topics current in medical law and ethics, the issue of informed consent ap...
Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB is a deeply troubling decision when read closely. Paradoxically, its rul...
The law of informed consent to medical treatment has recently been extensively overhauled in England...
This article explores the scope and application of Chester v Afshar following Montgomery v Lanarkshi...
The UK Supreme Court ruling of Montgomery v Lanarkshire clarified that in obtaining informed consent...